Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34493613›Full record

ArticleNeurology2021

Comparing Perimenstrual and Nonperimenstrual Migraine Attacks Using an e-Diary.

Daphne S van Casteren, Iris E Verhagen, Britt W H van der Arend, Erik W van Zwet, Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink, Gisela M Terwindt

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06659120 (Fremanezumab for the Prevention of Menstrually-related Migraine Attacks - a Prospective, Observational Study According to Routine Neurological Care in Switzerland), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06659120 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Fremanezumab for the Prevention of Menstrually-related Migraine Attacks - a Prospective, Observational Study According to Routine Neurological Care in Switzerland

TypeobservationalSponsorInsel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernRan2024 to 2027Enrolled120ConditionsMenstrual MigraineArmsFremanezumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy of lasmiditan for the acute treatment of perimenstrual migraine.Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache · 2022
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Sex-specific considerations in migraine therapy.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daphne S van CasterenFrom the Departments of Neurology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., G.M.T.) and Medical Statistics (E.W.Z.), Leiden University Medical Center; and Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., A.M.V.D.B.), Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. G.M.Terwindt@lumc.nl.
Iris E VerhagenFrom the Departments of Neurology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., G.M.T.) and Medical Statistics (E.W.Z.), Leiden University Medical Center; and Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., A.M.V.D.B.), Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9509-7233
Britt W H van der ArendFrom the Departments of Neurology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., G.M.T.) and Medical Statistics (E.W.Z.), Leiden University Medical Center; and Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., A.M.V.D.B.), Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8999-0087
Erik W van ZwetFrom the Departments of Neurology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., G.M.T.) and Medical Statistics (E.W.Z.), Leiden University Medical Center; and Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., A.M.V.D.B.), Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrinkFrom the Departments of Neurology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., G.M.T.) and Medical Statistics (E.W.Z.), Leiden University Medical Center; and Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., A.M.V.D.B.), Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Gisela M TerwindtFrom the Departments of Neurology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., G.M.T.) and Medical Statistics (E.W.Z.), Leiden University Medical Center; and Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology (D.S.C., I.E.V., B.W.H.A., A.M.V.D.B.), Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesEndogenous and exogenous female sex hormones are considered important contributors to migraine pathophysiology. Previous studies have cautiously suggested that perimenstrual migraine attacks have a longer duration and are associated with higher disability compared to nonperimenstrual attacks, but they showed conflicting results on acute therapy efficacy, pain intensity, and associated symptoms. We compared perimenstrual and nonperimenstrual migraine attack characteristics and assessed premenstrual syndrome (PMS) in women with migraine.

methodsWomen with migraine were invited to complete a headache e-diary. Characteristics of perimenstrual attacks and nonperimenstrual attacks were compared. The primary outcome was attack duration. Secondary outcomes were headache intensity, accompanying symptoms, acute medication intake, and pain coping. Mixed effects models were used to account for multiple attacks within patients. PMS was assessed in patients without hormonal contraceptives. Subgroup analyses were performed for women with menstrually related migraine (MRM) and nonmenstrually related migraine (non-MRM) and women with a natural menstrual cycle and women using hormonal contraceptives.

resultsA representative group of 500 participants completed the e-diary for at least 1 month. Perimenstrual migraine attacks (n = 998) compared with nonperimenstrual attacks (n = 4097) were associated with longer duration (20.0 vs 16.1 hours, 95% confidence interval 0.2-0.4), higher recurrence risk (odds ratio [OR] 2.4 [2.0-2.9]), increased triptan intake (OR 1.2 [1.1-1.4]), higher headache intensity (OR 1.4 [1.2-1.7]), less pain coping (mean difference -0.2 [-0.3 to -0.1]), more pronounced photophobia (OR 1.3 [1.2-1.4]) and phonophobia (OR 1.2 [1.1-1.4]), and less aura (OR 0.8 [0.6-1.0]). In total, 396/500 women completed the diary for ≥3 consecutive menstrual cycles, of whom 56% (221/396) fulfilled MRM criteria. Differences in attack characteristics became more pronounced when focusing on women with MRM and women using hormonal contraceptives. Prevalence of PMS was not different for women with MRM compared to non-MRM (11% vs 15%). DISCUSSION: The longer duration of perimenstrual migraine attacks in women (with MRM) is associated with higher recurrence risk and increased triptan use. This may increase the risk of medication overuse and emphasizes the need to develop female-specific prophylactic treatment.

Indexed as

Medical RecordsMenstruationMigraine DisordersAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrevalenceTryptaminesTryptamines

Identifiers

PMID34493613
PMCPMC8605615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.