Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34493558›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2021

Recurrent stridor in an infant.

Chien Ying Vincent Ngu, Jeyasakthy Saniasiaya, Jeyanthi Kulasegarah

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chien Ying Vincent NguDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Malaya, Faculty of Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, WP Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Jeyasakthy SaniasiayaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Malaya, Faculty of Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, WP Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia shakthy_18@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1974-4379
Jeyanthi KulasegarahDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Malaya, Faculty of Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, WP Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
University of Malaya · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paediatric upper airway obstruction is an emergency that requires immediate intervention. Among the myriad factors that leads to upper airway obstruction in paediatric age group, bilateral vocal cord palsy is not commonly encountered in clinical practice. The underlying cause of bilateral vocal cord palsy requires thorough investigation prior to deciding on the appropriate intervention. Herein, we report a 4-month-old baby boy who presented with recurrent inspiratory stridor with bilateral vocal cord palsy secondary to Arnold Chiari II malformation. Immediate intervention to drain the hydrocephalous resulted in complete resolution of stridor without having to perform a tracheostomy. We highlight the importance of meticulous and thorough investigations especially in children, as emergent airway intervention such as tracheostomy may result in detrimental effect to speech, swallowing as well as quality of life.

Indexed as

Arnold-Chiari MalformationVocal Cord ParalysisChildHumansInfantLaryngoscopyMaleQuality of LifeRespiratory Soundscongenital disordersearnose and throat/otolaryngologypaediatrics

Identifiers

PMID34493558
PMCPMC8424877
OpenAlexW3198581304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.