Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34493497›Full record

ArticleBMJ open diabetes research & care2021

Using a community-based participatory research approach to meaningfully engage those with lived experience of diabetes and homelessness.

David J T Campbell, Rachel B Campbell, Anna DiGiandomenico, Matthew Larsen, Marleane A Davidson, Kerry McBrien, Gillian L Booth, Stephen W Hwang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open diabetes research & care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. "Cold Hard Cash": The Value of Direct Unconditional Compensation for People With Lived Expertise of Homelessness.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Rethinking patient-oriented research.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David J T CampbellDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada dcampbel@ucalgary.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-5570-3630
Rachel B CampbellDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Anna DiGiandomenicoPatient Partners, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Matthew LarsenDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Marleane A DavidsonPatient Partners, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kerry McBrienDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Gillian L BoothDepartment of Medicine, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Stephen W HwangDepartment of Medicine, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Calgary · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionParticipatory research is a study method that engages patients in research programs, ideally from study design through to dissemination. It is not commonly used in diabetes health services research. Our objectives were to describe the process and challenges of conducting a participatory research project and to highlight the experiences of both patient co-researchers and academic researchers. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe recruited people with lived experience of homelessness (PWLEH) and diabetes in Toronto, Canada to become patient co-researchers. They were asked to commit to attending biweekly meetings. We undertook two major research projects: concept mapping to choose a research focus; and photovoice to explore accessing healthy food while homeless. We used a convergent mixed-methods design to evaluate their experience.

resultsA diverse group of eight PWLEH had an average attendance of 82% over 21 meetings-despite this success, we encountered a number of challenges of conducting this research: funding, ethics approval and recruitment were particularly difficult. Group members reported that participation improved their ability to self-advocate in their diabetes care and provided them with tangible skills and social benefits. Group members stated that they valued being involved in all aspects of the research, in particular knowledge translation activities, including advocating for nutritious food at shelters; presenting to stakeholders; and meeting with policymakers.

conclusionsThe use of participatory research methods enables academic researchers to support community members in pursuing research that is pertinent to them and which has a positive impact. In our study, co-researchers contributed in meaningful ways and also valued the experience.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusIll-Housed PersonsCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchHumansResearch DesignResearch Personnelparticipatory researchpovertyqualitative researchvulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID34493497
PMCPMC8424863
OpenAlexW3197334791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.