ArticleGene2020
Splice2Deep: An ensemble of deep convolutional neural networks for improved splice site prediction in genomic DNA.
Article in Gene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- SpliceDetector: A Splice Sites Detection Method Based on Biology Attention and Ensemble Module.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026Article
- seqLens: Optimizing Language Models for Genomic Predictions.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Application of deep learning in crop research: From genomics to phenomics.The plant genome · 2026Review
- Comprehensive review and assessment of multi-species splicing variant prediction: task-specific deep learning models and genomic foundation models.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Improving spliced alignment by modeling splice sites with deep learning.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2026Article
- Impact of U2-type introns on splice site prediction in A. thaliana species using deep learning.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Article
- Splam: a deep-learning-based splice site predictor that improves spliced alignments.Genome biology · 2024Article
- DRANetSplicer: A Splice Site Prediction Model Based on Deep Residual Attention Networks.Genes · 2024Article
- An automated framework for evaluation of deep learning models for splice site predictions.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- In silico methods for predicting functional synonymous variants.Genome biology · 2023Review
- CNNSplice: Robust models for splice site prediction using convolutional neural networks.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- Advances in alternative splicing identification: deep learning and pantranscriptome.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- EnsembleSplice: ensemble deep learning model for splice site prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Article
- Improved recognition of splice sites in3 Biotech · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Reprint of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe accurate identification of the exon/intron boundaries is critical for the correct annotation of genes with multiple exons. Donor and acceptor splice sites (SS) demarcate these boundaries. Therefore, deriving accurate computational models to predict the SS are useful for functional annotation of genes and genomes, and for finding alternative SS associated with different diseases. Although various models have been proposed for the in silico prediction of SS, improving their accuracy is required for reliable annotation. Moreover, models are often derived and tested using the same genome, providing no evidence of broad application, i.e. to other poorly studied genomes.
resultsWith this in mind, we developed the Splice2Deep models for SS detection. Each model is an ensemble of deep convolutional neural networks. We evaluated the performance of the models based on the ability to detect SS in Homo sapiens, Oryza sativa japonica, Arabidopsis thaliana, Drosophila melanogaster, and Caenorhabditis elegans. Results demonstrate that the models efficiently detect SS in other organisms not considered during the training of the models. Compared to the state-of-the-art tools, Splice2Deep models achieved significantly reduced average error rates of 41.97% and 28.51% for acceptor and donor SS, respectively. Moreover, the Splice2Deep cross-organism validation demonstrates that models correctly identify conserved genomic elements enabling annotation of SS in new genomes by choosing the taxonomically closest model.
conclusionsThe results of our study demonstrated that Splice2Deep both achieved a considerably reduced error rate compared to other state-of-the-art models and the ability to accurately recognize SS in other organisms for which the model was not trained, enabling annotation of poorly studied or newly sequenced genomes. Splice2Deep models are implemented in Python using Keras API; the models and the data are available at https://github.com/SomayahAlbaradei/Splice_Deep.git.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34493371What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.