Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34493334›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2021

The epidemiology of bloodstream infections and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Thuringia, Germany: a five-year prospective, state-wide surveillance study (AlertsNet).

Franziska Schöneweck, Roland P H Schmitz, Florian Rißner, André Scherag, Bettina Löffler, Mathias W Pletz, Sebastian Weis, Frank M Brunkhorst, Stefan Hagel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Clinical epidemiology and case fatality due to antimicrobial resistance in Germany: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2021.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. A review of bloodstream infections-pathogens, pathogenesis, diagnostic strategies, treatment methods-challenges and future aspects.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Comparative analytical performance of Autof MS2600 and Biotyper Sirius for rapid MALDI-TOF MS identification of microorganisms from positive blood cultures.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A potential XGBoost Diagnostic Score forFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Franziska Schöneweck *Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Roland P H Schmitz *Center for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Florian RißnerCenter for Clinical Studies Jena (ZKS), Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
André ScheragCenter for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Bettina LöfflerCenter for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Mathias W PletzInstitute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Sebastian WeisCenter for Sepsis Control and Care (CSCC), Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Frank M Brunkhorst *Center for Clinical Studies Jena (ZKS), Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Stefan Hagel *Institute for Infectious Diseases and Infection Control, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. stefan.hagel@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2999-6131

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01EO1502Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01 ZZ 1803CBundesministerium für Gesundheit IIA5-2512FSB114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMonitoring pathogens of bloodstream infections (BSI) and their antibiotic susceptibility is important to guide empiric antibiotic treatment strategies and prevention programs. This study assessed the epidemiology of BSI and antibiotic resistance patterns at the German Federal State of Thuringia longitudinally.

methodsA surveillance network consisting of 26 hospitals was established to monitor BSIs from 01/2015 to 12/2019. All blood culture results, without restriction of age of patients, of the participating hospitals were reported by the respective microbiological laboratory. A single detection of obligate pathogens and a repeated detection of coagulase-negative staphylococci, Bacillus spp., Corynebacterium spp., Micrococcus spp. and Propionibacterium spp., within 96 h were regarded as a relevant positive blood culture. If one of the aforementioned non-obligate pathogens has been detected only once within 96 h, contamination has been assumed. Logistic regression models were applied to analyse the relationship between resistance, year of BSI and hospital size. Generalized estimating equations were used to address potential clustering.

resultsA total of 343,284 blood cultures (BC) of 82,527 patients were recorded. Overall, 2.8% (n = 9571) of all BCs were classified as contaminated. At least one relevant pathogen was identified in 13.2% (n = 45,346) of BCs. Escherichia coli (25.4%) was the most commonly detected pathogen, followed by Staphylococcus aureus (15.2%), Staphylococcus epidermidis (8.1%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (4.6%). In S. aureus, we observed a decline of methicillin resistance (MRSA) from 10.4% in 2015 to 2.5% in 2019 (p < 0.001). The rate of vancomycin resistance in Enterococcus faecium (VRE) has increased from 16.7% in 2015 to 26.9% in 2019 (p < 0.001), with a peak in 2018 (42.5%). In addition, we observed an increase of Cefotaxime (3GC) resistance in E. coli from 10.7% in 2015 to 14.5% in 2019 (p = 0.007) whereas 3GC resistance in K. pneumoniae was stable (2015: 9.9%; 2019: 7.4%, p = 0.35). Carbapenem resistance was less than 1% for both pathogens. These patterns were robustly observed across sensitivity analyses.

conclusionsWe observed evidence for a decline in MRSA, an increase in VRE and a very low rate of carbapenem resistance in gram-negative bacteria. 3GC resistance in E. coli increased constantly over time.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, MicrobialAgedAged, 80 and overCandidaCarbapenemsEnterococcus faeciumEscherichia coliGermanyHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeMethicillin ResistanceMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSepsisStaphylococcus epidermidisCarbapenemsBloodstream infectionsEpidemiologyESBLMRSASurveillance

Identifiers

PMID34493334
PMCPMC8424790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.