ArticleBMC anesthesiology2021
Case report: Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section in a parturient with Potocki-Lupski syndrome.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anesthesia in a Patient with Potocki-Lupski Syndrome.Case reports in anesthesiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPotocki -Lupski syndrome is an uncommon disorder caused by a micro-duplication in chromosome 17p11.2. Variable clinical manifestations bring troubles to the general and neuraxial anesthesia, including mental retardation, facial dysmorphisms, structural cardiovascular anomalies, scoliosis, and malignant hyperthermia. Until now, the anesthesia management for cesarean section in these patients has not been reported yet. CASE PRESENTATION: Here we present a 23-year-old Chinese parturient with Potocki -Lupski syndrome who underwent elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. She was transferred to our hospital in her 40th week of gestation. She had a history of IgA nephropathy for more than three years and was diagnosed with Potocki -Lupski syndrome (17p12p11.2 segment 3.1 Mb repeat) in the 29th week of pregnancy. Amniocentesis showed the fetus had no abnormal autosomes. Preoperative multidisciplinary consultation suggested that she should terminate the pregnancy as soon as possible. She was ASA II. Her BMI was 26.43 kg/m
conclusionTo date, the case may be the first reported spinal anesthesia for the parturient with Potocki -Lupski syndrome. Although its manifestations are variable, the spinal anesthesia is feasible under careful and comprehensive preoperative evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.