ArticlePathogens and global health2021
Spotted fever diagnosis: Experience from a South Indian center.
Article in Pathogens and global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differentiating Spotted Fever From Scrub Typhus Based on Clinical and Laboratory Features: A Retrospective Cohort Study From South India.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- A Review of Rickettsial Diseases Other Than Scrub Typhus in India.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023Review
- Purpura Fulminans and Spotted Fever: A Case Series from South India.Journal of global infectious diseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spotted fever (SF) is an important treatable cause of acute febrile illness (AFI) with rash and has reemerged in India. A prospective AFI with rash study was undertaken at a South Indian hospital to correlate specific clinical findings with laboratory confirmation of spotted fever. During the study period (December 2017 to May 2019), 175 patients with fever and rash were suspected to have spotted fever. Molecular assays for scrub typhus and spotted fever (47 kDa and ompA qPCR) and serology (IgM ELISA) was performed on the 96 individuals recruited. Laboratory confirmed SF cases (ompA qPCR positive) were 21, whereas laboratory supported SF cases (ompA negative but sero-positive by SF IgM ELISA) were 27. Among the 48 spotted fever (SF) cases, 70% of had maculopapular rash, 12.5% had macular rash, purpuric/petechial rash (severe rash) was seen in 8 patients (16.7%). Presence of rash on the palms and soles was associated with a relative risk (RR) of 4.36 (95% CI: 2.67-7.10; p < 0.001). Our study suggests that ompA qPCR though useful for confirming the diagnosis of spotted fever is not always positive. A positive SF IgM ELISA in febrile individuals with palmo-plantar rash supports the diagnosis of spotted fever especially when other causes of febrile rash have been excluded. Multi-centric prospective studies employing the serological reference standard, IFA (immunofluorescence assay) in addition to the assays used in this study are needed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.