ArticleESC heart failure2021
Sympathetic activation in heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction: the role of aetiology.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Sympathetic activation in heart failure with reduced and mildly reduced ejection fraction: the role of aetiology.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimWhile sympathetic overactivity in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF; EF < 40%) is well-documented, it is ill-defined in patients with mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF; EF 40-49%). Furthermore, the significance of ischaemic versus non-ischaemic aetiology in sympathetic activation is also unclear and has yet to be studied in HF. Our goal was to compare muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) in HFmrEF and HFrEF patients and in healthy subjects, as well as to elucidate the influence of the underlying disease. METHODS AND
resultsTwenty-three HFrEF (age 58 ± 10 years), 33 HFmrEF patients (age 61 ± 10 years), including 11 subjects with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy in each HF groups and 10 healthy controls (age 55 ± 10 years), were studied. MSNA-detected by peroneal microneurography, continuous arterial pressure, and ECG-was recorded. MSNA frequency (burst/min) and incidence (burst/100 cycles) were calculated. Association with the patients' characteristics were assessed, and aetiology-based comparisons were performed. Burst frequency demonstrated a significant stepwise increase in both HFmrEF (41 ± 11 burst/min) and HFrEF (58 ± 17 burst/min, P < 0.001) patients as compared with controls (27 ± 9; P < 0.001 for both HF groups). Similarly, burst incidences were 66 ± 17, 82 ± 15, and 36 ± 10 burst/100 cycles in HFmrEF, HFrEF patients, and in healthy controls, respectively (P < 0.001 for all). Burst frequencies in HF patients showed significant correlation with NT-proBNP levels, and significant inverse correlations with the subjects' mean RR intervals, stroke volumes, pulse pressures, and EF.
conclusionsMuscle sympathetic nerve activity parameters indicated significant sympathetic activation in both HFmrEF and HFrEF patients as compared with healthy controls with no difference in relation to ischaemic versus non-ischaemic aetiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.