Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34492684›Full record

ArticleBlood advances2022

Core set of patient-reported outcomes for myelodysplastic syndromes: an EUMDS Delphi study involving patients and hematologists.

Igor Stojkov, Annette Conrads-Frank, Ursula Rochau, Karin A Koinig, Marjan Arvandi, Sibylle Puntscher, Corine van Marrewijk, Pierre Fenaux, Argiris Symeonidis, Fatiha Chermat and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 10 institutions in 9 countries.

Igor StojkovInstitute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making, and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics, and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Annette Conrads-FrankInstitute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making, and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics, and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-4304-1668
Ursula RochauInstitute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making, and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics, and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Karin A KoinigDepartment of Internal Medicine V (Hematology and Oncology), Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3659-4934
Marjan ArvandiInstitute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making, and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics, and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0976-9479
Sibylle PuntscherInstitute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making, and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics, and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0591-7067
Corine van MarrewijkDepartment of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9547-908X
Pierre FenauxService d'Hématologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) and Université Paris 7, Paris, France.
Argiris SymeonidisDepartment of Medicine, Division Hematology, University of Patras Medical School, Patras, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-3685-3473
Fatiha ChermatGroupe Francophone des Myélodysplasies (GFM), Paris, France.
Hege GareliusSection of Hematology and Coagulation, Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden.
David BowenSt James's Institute of Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Moshe MittelmanDepartment of Medicine A, Tel Aviv Sourasky (Ichilov) Medical Center and Sackler Medical Faculty, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Elvira MoraHospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe.ORCID 0000-0003-3361-8803
Theo de WitteDepartment of Tumor Immunology, Nijmegen Center for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Fabio EfficaceHealth Outcomes Research Unit, Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell'Adulto (GIMEMA), Rome, Italy.
Uwe SiebertInstitute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making, and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics, and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Reinhard StauderDepartment of Internal Medicine V (Hematology and Oncology), Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8993-9561
Innsbruck Medical University · ATRadboud University Nijmegen · NLFondazione Gimema Onlus · ITGroupe Francophone des Myélodysplasies · FRHarvard University · USHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESSahlgrenska University Hospital · SETel Aviv University · ILUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity of Patras · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are relevant and valuable end points in the care of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, a consensus-based selection of PROs for MDS, derived by both patients and hematologists, is lacking. We aimed to develop a core set of PROs for patients with MDS as part of the prospective European LeukemiaNet MDS (EUMDS) Registry. According to international guidelines, candidate PROs were identified from a comprehensive literature search of MDS studies. Overall, 40 PROs were selected and evaluated in a two-round Delphi survey by 40 patients with MDS and 38 hematologists in the first round and 38 patients and 32 hematologists in the second round. Based on an agreement scale and predefined inclusion criteria, both patients and hematologists selected "general quality of life" as a core PRO. Hematologists also selected "transfusion-dependency burden" and "ability to work/activities of daily living" as core PROs. The second Delphi round increased PRO rating agreements. Statistically significant rating differences between patients and hematologists were observed for 28 PROs (Mann-Whitney U test; P < .05) in the first round and for 19 PROs in the second round, with "disease knowledge" and "confidence in health care services" rated notably higher by patients. The overall mean PRO ratings correlation between the 2 groups was moderate (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient = 0.5; P < .05). This first consensus on a core set of PROs jointly developed by patients and hematologists forms the basis for patient-centered care in daily practice and clinical research.

Indexed as

Myelodysplastic SyndromesQuality of LifeActivities of Daily LivingDelphi TechniqueHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34492684
PMCPMC8753222
OpenAlexW3198228494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.