Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34492151›Full record

ArticleHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia2021

Coordinating physiotherapy care for persons with haemophilia.

Merel A Timmer, Johan Blokzijl, Roger E G Schutgens, Cindy Veenhof, Martijn F Pisters

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Coordinating physiotherapy care for persons with haemophilia.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Merel A TimmerVan Creveldkliniek, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1910-999X
Johan BlokzijlVan Creveldkliniek, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Roger E G SchutgensVan Creveldkliniek, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2762-6033
Cindy VeenhofPhysical Therapy Research, Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sport, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Martijn F PistersCenter for Physical Therapy Research and Innovation in Primary Care, Julius Health Care Centres, The Netherlands.
Utrecht University · NLPrimary Health Care · QAUniversity of Applied Sciences Utrecht · NL

Funding

University Fund Utrecht University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPhysiotherapy is highly recommended for persons with haemophilia (PWH), to regain functioning after bleeding and to maintain functioning when dealing with haemophilic arthropathy. However, many PWH live too far from their Haemophilia Comprehensive Care Centre (HCCC) to receive regular treatment at their HCCC. Physiotherapists in primary care may have limited experience with a rare disease like haemophilia.

aimTo explore experiences of stakeholders with primary care physiotherapy for PWH and develop recommendations to optimize physiotherapy care coordination.

methodsA RAND approach was used, consisting of a Delphi procedure with e-mailed questionnaires and a consensus meeting. Included stakeholders were PWH, physiotherapists from HCCC's and primary care physiotherapists. HCCC physiotherapists approached patients from their centre and primary care physiotherapists from their network to fill in the questionnaires. Purposive sampling was used to select participants from the survey sample for the consensus meeting.

resultsNinety-six primary care physiotherapists, 54 PWH and eight HCCC physiotherapists completed the questionnaire. Subsequently, four PWH, three primary care physiotherapists and four HCCC physiotherapists participated in the consensus meeting. The questionnaires yielded 33 recommendations, merged into a final list of 20 recommendations based on the consensus meeting. The final rank-order consists of 13 recommendations prioritized by at least one stakeholder.

conclusionCommitment to a formal network is considered not feasible for a rare disease like haemophilia. Development of a practice guideline, easy-accessible information and contact details, two-way and open communication between HCCC and primary care and criteria to refer back to the HCCC are recommended.

Indexed as

Hemophilia APhysical TherapistsHemorrhageHumansPhysical Therapy ModalitiesSurveys and Questionnairescare coordinationcomprehensive carehaemophiliaphysiotherapyprimary carerare disease

Identifiers

PMID34492151
PMCPMC9292005
OpenAlexW3198043253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.