Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34492090›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Safety and image quality at 7T MRI for deep brain stimulation systems: Ex vivo study with lead-only and full-systems.

Bhumi Bhusal, Jason Stockmann, Bastien Guerin, Azma Mareyam, John Kirsch, Lawrence L Wald, Mark J Nolt, Joshua Rosenow, Roberto Lopez-Rosado, Behzad Elahi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Low-field MRI's Spark on Implant Safety: A Closer Look at Radiofrequency Heating.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2023
    Article
  6. RF-induced heating of capped and uncapped abandoned epicardial leads during MRI at 1.5 T and 3 T.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2023
    Article
  7. Rapid prediction of MRI-induced RF heating of active implantable medical devices using machine learning.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2023
    Article
  8. Optimizing the trajectory of deep brain stimulation leads reduces RF heating during MRI at 3 T: Characteristics and clinical translation.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Position and Orientation of the Pulse Generator Affects MRI RF Heating of Epicardial Leads in Children.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2022
    Article
  13. A comparative study of MRI-induced RF heating in pediatric and adult populations with epicardial and endocardial implantable electronic devices.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2022
    Article
  14. True location of deep brain stimulation electrodes differs from what is seen on postoperative magnetic resonance images: An anthropomorphic phantom study.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Intraoperative MR Imaging during Glioma Resection.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bhumi BhusalDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4404-9784
Jason StockmannDepartment of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Bastien GuerinDepartment of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Azma MareyamAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
John KirschAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Lawrence L WaldDepartment of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Mark J NoltDepartment of Neurosurgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Joshua RosenowDepartment of Neurosurgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7726-2496
Roberto Lopez-RosadoDepartment of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Behzad ElahiDepartment of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Laleh GolestaniradDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America.

Funding

Patient-adjustable MRI technology for high-resolution imaging of deep brain stimulationR00EB021320 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GOLESTANI RAD, LALEH · 2018 to 2020
$733k
NIBIB NIH HHS R00 EB021320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultra-high field MRI at 7 T can produce much better visualization of sub-cortical structures compared to lower field, which can greatly help target verification as well as overall treatment monitoring for patients with deep brain stimulation (DBS) implants. However, use of 7 T MRI for such patients is currently contra-indicated by guidelines from the device manufacturers due to the safety issues. The aim of this study was to provide an assessment of safety and image quality of ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging at 7 T in patients with deep brain stimulation implants. We performed experiments with both lead-only and complete DBS systems implanted in anthropomorphic phantoms. RF heating was measured for 43 unique patient-derived device configurations. Magnetic force measurements were performed according to ASTM F2052 test method, and device integrity was assessed before and after experiments. Finally, we assessed electrode artifact in a cadaveric brain implanted with an isolated DBS lead. RF heating remained below 2°C, similar to a fever, with the 95% confidence interval between 0.38°C-0.52°C. Magnetic forces were well below forces imposed by gravity, and thus not a source of concern. No device malfunctioning was observed due to interference from MRI fields. Electrode artifact was most noticeable on MPRAGE and T2*GRE sequences, while it was minimized on T2-TSE images. Our work provides the safety assessment of ultra-high field MRI at 7 T in patients with DBS implants. Our results suggest that 7 T MRI may be performed safely in patients with DBS implants for specific implant models and MRI hardware.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationImage EnhancementMagnetic Resonance ImagingArtifactsHumansPhantoms, ImagingRadio WavesTemperature

Identifiers

PMID34492090
PMCPMC8423254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.