Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34492044›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Healthy volunteers in US phase I clinical trials: Sociodemographic characteristics and participation over time.

Corey A Kalbaugh, Julianne M Kalbaugh, Lisa McManus, Jill A Fisher

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. "Death and Taxes": Why Financial Compensation for Research Participants is an Economic and Legal Risk.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Corey A KalbaughDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States of America.
Julianne M KalbaughDepartment of Social Medicine and Center for Bioethics, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.
Lisa McManusDepartment of Sociology, Wake Technical Community College, Raleigh, NC, United States of America.
Jill A FisherDepartment of Social Medicine and Center for Bioethics, School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9487-1493
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USClemson University · USWake Technical Community College · US

Funding

Healthy Volunteers as Model Organisms: Comparative Research Ethics and Policy for Phase I trialsR01GM099952 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FISHER, JILL A, WALKER, REBECCA · 2012 to 2020
$3.6M
Understanding and Addressing Racial Disparities in Guideline-Indicated Management of Symptomatic Peripheral Artery DiseaseK01HL146900 · NHLBI · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI KALBAUGH, COREY ANDREW · 2020 to 2024
$680k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL146900NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasing the diversity of research participants is an important focus of clinical trials. However, little is known regarding who enrolls as healthy volunteers in Phase I clinical trials, which test the safety and tolerability of investigational new drugs. Despite the risk, healthy volunteers can derive no medical benefit from their participation, and they are financially compensated for enrolling.

objectiveThis study's purpose is to describe sociodemographic characteristics and clinical trial participation histories of healthy people who enroll in US Phase I trials.

methodsThe HealthyVOICES Project (HVP) is a longitudinal study of healthy individuals who have enrolled in Phase I trials. We describe self-reported sociodemographic information and Phase I trial history from HVP recruitment (May-December 2013) through the project's end three years later (December 2016). Trial experiences are presented as medians and quartiles.

resultsThe HVP included 178 participants. Nearly three-fourths of participants were male, and two-thirds were classified as racial and ethnic minorities. We found that some groups of participants were more likely to have completed a greater number of clinical trials over a longer timeframe than others. Those groups included participants who were male, Black, Hispanic, 30-39-years-old, unemployed, had received vocational training in a trade, or had annual household incomes of less than $25,000. Additionally, the greater the number of clinical trials participants had completed, the more likely they were to continue screening for new trials over the course of three years. Participants who pursued clinical trials as a full-time job participated in the greatest number of trials and were the most likely to continuing screening over time. IMPLICATIONS: Participation as a healthy volunteer in US Phase I trials is driven by social inequalities. Disadvantaged groups tend to participate in a greater number of clinical trials and participate longer than more privileged groups.

Indexed as

Healthy VolunteersSocial ClassSocioeconomic FactorsAdultBlack or African AmericanClinical Trials, Phase I as TopicFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleMinority GroupsRacial GroupsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID34492044
PMCPMC8423261
OpenAlexW3198688897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.