ArticlePloS one2021
Healthy volunteers in US phase I clinical trials: Sociodemographic characteristics and participation over time.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- How to Optimize Healthy Volunteer Screening and Enrolment in Clinical Trials: A Qualitative and Quantitative Approach to Evaluate Processes and Healthy Volunteers' Perceptions.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthy volunteer motivations: a mixed-methods study of participants in plague vaccine trials in the UK and Uganda.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Participant motivators and perceptions of risks and benefits in adult Phase 2/3 COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Leveraging In Silico and Artificial Intelligence Models to Advance Drug Disposition and Response Predictions Across the Lifespan.Clinical and translational science · 2025Review
- Diversity in decentralized clinical trials: prioritizing inclusion of underrepresented groups.BMC medical ethics · 2025Review
- Healthy participant engagement in early clinical trials: results from the European EUFEMED survey.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- At-Home Self-Collection of Pharmacokinetic Data: Design and Results From a Phase 1 Open-Label Feasibility Trial.Clinical pharmacology in drug development · 2025Article
- Diversity and Representation Among United States Participants in Amgen Clinical Trials.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2024Article
- Impact of financial compensation on enrollment and participation in a remote, mobile-app based research study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Sociodemographic characteristics of healthy volunteers along with their experience, attitude and concerns of clinical trials in Wuhan, China.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Mutual Emotional Labor as Method: Building Connections of Care in Qualitative Research.Qualitative report (Online) · 2023Article
- Factors that impact on recruitment to vaccine trials in the context of a pandemic or epidemic: a qualitative evidence synthesis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Review
- The Role of Transportation in the Enrollment of Elderly African Americans into Exercise and Memory Study: GEMS Study.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2023Article
- Demographic diversity of US-based participants in GSK-sponsored interventional clinical trials.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2023Article
- "Death and Taxes": Why Financial Compensation for Research Participants is an Economic and Legal Risk.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2023Article
- Why not? Motivations for entering a volunteer register for clinical trials during the COVID-19 pandemic.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Article
- Correction: Healthy volunteers in US phase I clinical trials: Sociodemographic characteristics and participation over time.PloS one · 2022Article
- Characterizing altruistic motivation in potential volunteers for SARS-CoV-2 challenge trials.PloS one · 2022Article
- Characteristics, Motivations, and Preferences of Healthy Volunteers in Phase I Clinical Trials in Sweden.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHREArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIncreasing the diversity of research participants is an important focus of clinical trials. However, little is known regarding who enrolls as healthy volunteers in Phase I clinical trials, which test the safety and tolerability of investigational new drugs. Despite the risk, healthy volunteers can derive no medical benefit from their participation, and they are financially compensated for enrolling.
objectiveThis study's purpose is to describe sociodemographic characteristics and clinical trial participation histories of healthy people who enroll in US Phase I trials.
methodsThe HealthyVOICES Project (HVP) is a longitudinal study of healthy individuals who have enrolled in Phase I trials. We describe self-reported sociodemographic information and Phase I trial history from HVP recruitment (May-December 2013) through the project's end three years later (December 2016). Trial experiences are presented as medians and quartiles.
resultsThe HVP included 178 participants. Nearly three-fourths of participants were male, and two-thirds were classified as racial and ethnic minorities. We found that some groups of participants were more likely to have completed a greater number of clinical trials over a longer timeframe than others. Those groups included participants who were male, Black, Hispanic, 30-39-years-old, unemployed, had received vocational training in a trade, or had annual household incomes of less than $25,000. Additionally, the greater the number of clinical trials participants had completed, the more likely they were to continue screening for new trials over the course of three years. Participants who pursued clinical trials as a full-time job participated in the greatest number of trials and were the most likely to continuing screening over time. IMPLICATIONS: Participation as a healthy volunteer in US Phase I trials is driven by social inequalities. Disadvantaged groups tend to participate in a greater number of clinical trials and participate longer than more privileged groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.