Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34491624›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2021

Detection of mobile elements insertions for routine clinical diagnostics in targeted sequencing data.

German Demidov, Joohyun Park, Sorin Armeanu-Ebinger, Cristiana Roggia, Ulrike Faust, Isabell Cordts, Maria Blandfort, Tobias B Haack, Christopher Schroeder, Stephan Ossowski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

German DemidovInstitute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9075-4276
Joohyun ParkInstitute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Sorin Armeanu-EbingerInstitute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Cristiana RoggiaInstitute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ulrike FaustInstitute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Isabell CordtsDepartment of Neurology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Maria BlandfortNeuropediatrics and Medical Genetics, Landau, Germany.
Tobias B HaackInstitute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Christopher SchroederInstitute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Stephan OssowskiInstitute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DEMedical Genetics Center · DETUM Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTargeted sequencing approaches such as gene panel or exome sequencing have become standard of care for the diagnosis of rare and common genetic disease. The detection and interpretation of point mutations, small insertions and deletions, and even exon-level copy number variants are well established in clinical genetic testing. Other types of genetic variation such as mobile elements insertions (MEIs) are technically difficult to detect. In addition, their downstream clinical interpretation is more complex compared to point mutations due to a larger genomic footprint that can not only predict a clear loss of protein function but might disturb gene regulation and splicing even when located within the non-coding regions. As a consequence, the contribution of MEIs to disease and tumor development remains largely unexplored in routine diagnostics.

methodsIn this study, we investigated the occurrence of MEIs in 7,693 exome datasets from individuals with rare diseases and healthy relatives as well as 788 cancer patients analyzed by panel sequencing.

resultsWe present several exemplary cases highlighting the diagnostic value of MEIs and propose a strategy for the detection, prioritization, and clinical interpretation of MEIs in routine clinical diagnostics.

conclusionIn this paper, we state that detection and interpretation of MEIs in clinical practice in targeted NGS data can be performed relatively easy despite the fact that MEIs very rarely occur in coding parts of the human genome. Large scale reanalysis of MEIs in existing cohorts may solve otherwise unsolvable cases.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Tests, RoutineDNA Transposable ElementsGenetic TestingMutagenesis, InsertionalComputational BiologyExome SequencingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetics, MedicalGerm-Line MutationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationOncogenesRare DiseasesSequence Analysis, DNADNA Transposable Elementsgenetic diagnosticsmobile elements insertionsstructural variantstargeted sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34491624
PMCPMC8683623
OpenAlexW3197546956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.