Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34491584›Full record

ArticleCognitive science2021

Conceptual Similarity and Communicative Need Shape Colexification: An Experimental Study.

Andres Karjus, Richard A Blythe, Simon Kirby, Tianyu Wang, Kenny Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andres KarjusERA Chair for Cultural Data Analytics, Tallinn University.ORCID 0000-0002-2445-5072
Richard A BlytheCentre for Language Evolution, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh.
Simon KirbyCentre for Language Evolution, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh.
Tianyu Wang
Kenny SmithCentre for Language Evolution, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh.

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 681942Horizon 2020 810961Postgraduate Research Support Grant of the School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences of the University of EdinburghSihtasutus Archimedes
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colexification refers to the phenomenon of multiple meanings sharing one word in a language. Cross-linguistic lexification patterns have been shown to be largely predictable, as similar concepts are often colexified. We test a recent claim that, beyond this general tendency, communicative needs play an important role in shaping colexification patterns. We approach this question by means of a series of human experiments, using an artificial language communication game paradigm. Our results across four experiments match the previous cross-linguistic findings: all other things being equal, speakers do prefer to colexify similar concepts. However, we also find evidence supporting the communicative need hypothesis: when faced with a frequent need to distinguish similar pairs of meanings, speakadjust their colexification preferences to maintain communicative efficiency and avoid colexifying those similar meanings which need to be distinguished in communication. This research provides further evidence to support the argument that languages are shaped by the needs and preferences of their speakers.

Indexed as

CommunicationLanguageHumansLinguisticsArtificial languageCognitive costColexificationCommunicative costCommunicative needComplexityExperimentalExpressivity

Identifiers

PMID34491584
PMCPMC9285023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.