Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34491564›Full record

ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2022

Colorblind Racial Ideology and Physician Use of Race in Medical Decision-Making.

Ebiere Okah, Janet Thomas, Andrea Westby, Brooke Cunningham

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Health in colour: black women, racism, and maternal health.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ebiere OkahDepartment of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 590 Manning Dr, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA. Ebiere_okah@med.unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3784-439X
Janet ThomasDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Andrea WestbyDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Brooke CunninghamDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
University of Minnesota Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Improving primary care providers ability to communicate about patients experiences of racism to improve cardiovascular health: a feasibilitystudyK23HL143146 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CUNNINGHAM, BROOKE A · 2019 to 2022
$789k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL143146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColorblindness is a racial ideology that minimizes the role of systemic racism in shaping outcomes for racial minorities. Physicians who embrace colorblindness may be less likely to interrogate the role of racism in generating health disparities and less likely to challenge race-based treatment. This study evaluates the association between physician colorblindness and the use of race in medical decision-making.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional survey study, conducted in September 2019, of members of the Minnesota Academy of Family Physicians. The survey included demographic and practice questions and two measures: Color-blind Racial Attitudes Scale (CoBRAS; measuring unawareness of racial privilege, institutional discrimination, and blatant racial issues) and Racial Attributes in Clinical Evaluation (RACE; measuring the use of race in medical decision-making). Multivariable regression analyses assessed the relationship between CoBRAS and RACE.

resultsOur response rate was 17% (267/1595). In a multivariable analysis controlling for physician demographic and practice characteristics, CoBRAS scores were positively associated with RACE (β = 0.05, p = 0.02). When CoBRAS subscales were used in place of the overall CoBRAS score, only unawareness of institutional discrimination was positively associated with RACE (β = 0.18, p = 0.01).

conclusionsPhysicians who adhere to a color blind racial ideology, particularly those who deny institutional racism, are more likely to use race in medical decision-making. As the use of race may be due to a colorblind racial ideology, and therefore due to a poor understanding of how systemic racism affects health, more physician education about racism as a health risk is needed.

Indexed as

PhysiciansRacismAttitudeClinical Decision-MakingCross-Sectional StudiesHumansColorblindnessMedical decision-makingPhysiciansRace-based medicine

Identifiers

PMID34491564
PMCPMC8898981
OpenAlexW3196840044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.