ArticleJAMA network open2021
Temporal Trends and Hospital Variation in Time-to-Antibiotics Among Veterans Hospitalized With Sepsis.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Best Practices for Optimizing Recovery from Sepsis; Results of an Expert Panel.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Characteristics associated with culture-positivity versus antibiotic administration in patients with cirrhosis on ICU admission: a retrospective cohort study in 5 hospitals.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Uncertainty and Antibiotic Timing in Sepsis: Observational Validation of a Dual-Axis Decision Model.Critical care explorations · 2026Observational
- Presenting Symptoms and Antibiotic Timing Among Hospitalized Adults With Presumed Sepsis.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Optimization of Preclinical Rodent Research Models of Human Shock: Part One Intra-Abdominal Sepsis.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2026Review
- Physician Variation in Early Sepsis Management.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Comparing the mortality of patients with sepsis using empirical piperacillin/tazobactam and cefepime: analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Goals of Care Assessment during Hospitalization for Sepsis.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025Article
- The Complete Blood Count Sepsis Index Using Monocyte Distribution Width for Early Detection of Sepsis in Patients Without Obvious Signs.Critical care explorations · 2025Observational
- Interdisciplinary Team Pilot to Reduce Time to Administration of Piperacillin/Tazobactam in the Emergency Department at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Social Determinants of Health and Risk-Adjusted Sepsis Mortality in the Nationwide Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Observational
- Hospital-Onset Sepsis Warrants Expanded Investigation and Consideration as a Unique Clinical Entity.Chest · 2024Review
- Heterogeneity of Benefit from Earlier Time-to-Antibiotics for Sepsis.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024Observational
- Improving Sepsis Outcomes in the Era of Pay-for-Performance and Electronic Quality Measures: A Joint IDSA/ACEP/PIDS/SHEA/SHM/SIDP Position Paper.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024Article
- Identification and classification of principal features for analyzing unwarranted clinical variation.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2024Review
- Impact of Reducing Time-to-Antibiotics on Sepsis Mortality, Antibiotic Use, and Adverse Events.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2024Article
- What Are We Aiming for in Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure?Respiratory care · 2023Article
- Institutional Structures and Processes to Support Sepsis Care: A Multihospital Study.Critical care explorations · 2023Article
- Antimicrobials in Sepsis: Time to Pay Attention toAnnals of the American Thoracic Society · 2023Article
- A Multi-Hospital Survey of Current Practices for Supporting Recovery From Sepsis.Critical care explorations · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: It is unclear whether antimicrobial timing for sepsis has changed outside of performance incentive initiatives. Objective: To examine temporal trends and variation in time-to-antibiotics for sepsis in the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational cohort study included 130 VA hospitals from 2013 to 2018. Participants included all patients admitted to the hospital via the emergency department with sepsis from 2013 to 2018, using a definition adapted from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Adult Sepsis Event definition, which requires evidence of suspected infection, acute organ dysfunction, and systemic antimicrobial therapy within 12 hours of presentation. Data were analyzed from October 6, 2020, to July 1, 2021. Exposures: Time from presentation to antibiotic administration. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was differences in time-to-antibiotics across study periods, hospitals, and patient subgroups defined by presenting temperature and blood pressure. Temporal trends in time-to-antibiotics were measured overall and by subgroups. Hospital-level variation in time-to-antibiotics was quantified after adjusting for differences in patient characteristics using multilevel linear regression models. Results: A total of 111 385 hospitalizations for sepsis were identified, including 107 547 men (96.6%) men and 3838 women (3.4%) with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) age of 68 (62-77) years. A total of 7574 patients (6.8%) died in the hospital, and 13 855 patients (12.4%) died within 30 days. Median (IQR) time-to-antibiotics was 3.9 (2.4-6.5) hours but differed by presenting characteristics. Unadjusted median (IQR) time-to-antibiotics decreased over time, from 4.5 (2.7-7.1) hours during 2013 to 2014 to 3.5 (2.2-5.9) hours during 2017 to 2018 (P < .001). In multilevel models adjusted for patient characteristics, median time-to-antibiotics declined by 9.0 (95% CI, 8.8-9.2) minutes per calendar year. Temporal trends in time-to-antibiotics were similar across patient subgroups, but hospitals with faster baseline time-to-antibiotics had less change over time, with hospitals in the slowest tertile decreasing time-to-antibiotics by 16.6 minutes (23.1%) per year, while hospitals in the fastest tertile decreased time-to-antibiotics by 7.2 minutes (13.1%) per year. In the most recent years (2017-2018), median time-to-antibiotics ranged from 3.1 to 6.7 hours across hospitals (after adjustment for patient characteristics), 6.8% of variation in time-to-antibiotics was explained at the hospital level, and odds of receiving antibiotics within 3 hours increased by 65% (95% CI, 56%-77%) for the median patient if moving to a hospital with faster time-to-antibiotics. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study across nationwide VA hospitals found that time-to-antibiotics for sepsis has declined over time. However, there remains significant variability in time-to-antibiotics not explained by patient characteristics, suggesting potential unwarranted practice variation in sepsis treatment. Efforts to further accelerate time-to-antibiotics must be weighed against risks of overtreatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.