Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34491314›Full record

ArticleDiseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus2021

Hashing out current social media use in eosinophilic esophagitis.

Shivani U Thanawala, Claire A Beveridge, Amanda B Muir, Mary Jo Strobel, Amity Westcott-Chavez, Marina Serper, Yu-Xiao Yang, Kristle L Lynch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exploring X: barriers to care for eosinophilic esophagitis.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Shows Multiple Inaccuracies When Responding to Questions About Eosinophilic Esophagitis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. What patients with eosinophilic esophagitis may not share with their providers: a qualitative assessment of online health communities.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shivani U ThanawalaDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1835-1381
Claire A BeveridgeDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Amanda B MuirCenter for Pediatric Eosinophilic Diseases, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology & Nutrition, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
Mary Jo StrobelAmerican Partnership for Eosinophilic Disorders, Atlanta, USA.
Amity Westcott-ChavezAmerican Partnership for Eosinophilic Disorders, Atlanta, USA.
Marina SerperDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Yu-Xiao YangDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Kristle L LynchDivision of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

Funding

CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING IN GASTROENTEROLOGYT32DK007740 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI James D Lewis · 1997 to 2026
$9.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007740NIDDK NIH HHS T32-DK007740NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients affected by chronic illnesses have increasingly turned to social media to gather disease-related information and connect with other patients. Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic disease with rapidly evolving management options. The aims of this study are to describe the current use of social media in EoE patients and caregivers, evaluate whether use of social media to learn about EoE is associated with higher medical knowledge of this disease, and evaluate social media factors that could result in improved patient and caregiver disease understanding.

methodsWe surveyed individuals 18 years or older in July 2020 who identified as either having EoE, or as being a caregiver for someone with EoE, through an invitation link sent to email subscribers of the American Partnership for Eosinophilic Disorders.

resultsOf the 212 survey responders, 82.5% used social media to learn about EoE. Caregivers were more likely to use social media than patients (OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.11-4.76). Social media use was not associated with higher knowledge of EoE. Distrust of posted content was the largest barrier to use and 87.7% of responders believed that physician contribution to posts would enhance the quality of information.

conclusionsIn one of the first known studies to evaluate use of social media in the context of EoE, we found that a majority of patient and caregiver respondents use social media to learn about EoE. This highlights the potential opportunity to leverage social media to provide current and accurate EoE educational content for patients and caregivers.

Indexed as

Eosinophilic EsophagitisSocial MediaCaregiversHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesdiseases of the eosinophilic esophagitisesophagus

Identifiers

PMID34491314
PMCPMC8597905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.