Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34490915›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2022

Validation of the Surrogate Threshold Effect for Change in Bone Mineral Density as a Surrogate Endpoint for Fracture Outcomes: The FNIH-ASBMR SABRE Project.

Richard Eastell, Eric Vittinghoff, Li-Yung Lui, Charles E McCulloch, Imre Pavo, Arkadi Chines, Sundeep Khosla, Jane A Cauley, Bruce Mitlak, Douglas C Bauer and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of proposed biosimilar RGB-14-P with denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the transition (switch) phase.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. A randomised Phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of proposed denosumab biosimilar RGB-14-P and reference denosumab in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Trial
  6. Impact of standard versus cyclic teriparatide and denosumab treatment on trabecular bone score: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Romosozumab followed by denosumab versus denosumab only: a post hoc analysis of FRAME and FRAME extension.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Trial
  10. The Efficacy and Safety of Abaloparatide-SC in Men With Osteoporosis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2022
    Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Three months of abaloparatide treatment rapidly improves bone formation and density: implications for orthopedic preoperative bone health optimization.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  14. Clarifying the romosozumab "Super-Responder" phenotype: response to methodological concerns.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Clarifying clinically treatment-naive status for osteoporosis patients.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Treatment patterns of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis in Denmark: findings from the ROmosozumab in Scandinavia real-world Evidence Study (ROSES).Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. ROMosozumab early experience in female patients with severe osteoporosis in an Italian real-world setting, the ROMEO study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard EastellAcademic Unit of Bone Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Eric VittinghoffDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8535-0920
Li-Yung LuiCalifornia Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Charles E McCullochDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Imre PavoEli Lilly and Company, Lilly Research Centre, Windlesham, UK.
Arkadi ChinesAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Sundeep KhoslaMayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2936-4372
Jane A CauleyDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0752-4408
Bruce MitlakRadius Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7050-0703
Douglas C BauerDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5261-7721
Mary BouxseinCenter for Advanced Orthopedic Studies, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7027-7414
Dennis M BlackDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5318-7575
University of California, San Francisco · USAmgen (United States) · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCalifornia Pacific Medical Center · USEli Lilly (United Kingdom) · GBMayo Clinic · USRadius Health (United States) · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Skeletal Biology and Biomechanics (SBB) CoreP30AR075055 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI EDWARD C HSIAO · 2019 to 2026
$7.1M
Regulatory qualification for DXA bone mineral density as a surrogate endpoint for fracture risk in osteoporosis trialsU01FD006881 · FDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BLACK, DENNIS M · 2019 to 2019
$207k
FDA HHS 1UO1FD006881-01FDA HHS U01 FD006881Medical Research Council MR/P020941/1NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR075055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The surrogate threshold effect (STE) is defined as the minimum treatment effect on a surrogate that is reliably predictive of a treatment effect on the clinical outcome. It provides a framework for implementing a clinical trial with a surrogate endpoint. The aim of this study was to update our previous analysis by validating the STE for change in total hip (TH) BMD as a surrogate for fracture risk reduction; the novelty of this study was this validation. To do so, we used individual patient data from 61,415 participants in 16 RCTs that evaluated bisphosphonates (nine trials), selective estrogen receptor modulators (four trials), denosumab (one trial), odanacatib (one trial), and teriparatide (one trial) to estimate trial-specific treatment effects on TH BMD and all, vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral fractures. We then conducted a random effects meta-regression of the log relative fracture risk reduction against 24-month change in TH BMD, and computed the STE as the intersection of the upper 95% prediction limit of this regression with the line of no fracture reduction. We validated the STE by checking whether the number of fractures in each trial provided 80% power and determining what proportion of trials with BMD changes ≥ STE reported significant reductions in fracture risk. We applied this analysis to (i) the trials on which we estimated the STE; and (ii) trials on which we did not estimate the STE. We found that the STEs for all, vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral fractures were 1.83%, 1.42%, 3.18%, and 2.13%, respectively. Among trials used to estimate STE, 27 of 28 were adequately powered, showed BMD effects exceeding the STE, and showed significant reductions in fracture risk. Among the validation set of 11 trials, 10 met these criteria. Thus STE differs by fracture type and has been validated in trials not used to develop the approach. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsFractures, BoneBiomarkersBone DensityDiphosphonatesHumansBiomarkersBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesBISPHOSPHONATESBONE MINERAL DENSITYFRACTURESELECTIVE ESTROGEN RECEPTOR MODULATORSSURROGATE

Identifiers

PMID34490915
PMCPMC9291617
OpenAlexW3198405278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.