Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34490888›Full record

ReviewDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2021

Deep learning for bioimage analysis in developmental biology.

Adrien Hallou, Hannah G Yevick, Bianca Dumitrascu, Virginie Uhlmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Development (Cambridge, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. SNAP-Tech 2.0.Nature chemical biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adrien HallouCavendish Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0HE, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3162-7848
Hannah G YevickDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2537-4928
Bianca DumitrascuComputer Laboratory, Cambridge, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0FD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8328-2354
Virginie UhlmannEuropean Bioinformatics Institute, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2859-9241

Funding

Investigating how mechanical connectivity yields developmental robustnessK99GM136915 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DUCLOS YEVICK, HANNAH GABRIELLE · 2020 to 2021
$198k
Cancer Research UK C6946/A24843NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM136915Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 098357/Z/12/ZWellcome Trust 203144/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning has transformed the way large and complex image datasets can be processed, reshaping what is possible in bioimage analysis. As the complexity and size of bioimage data continues to grow, this new analysis paradigm is becoming increasingly ubiquitous. In this Review, we begin by introducing the concepts needed for beginners to understand deep learning. We then review how deep learning has impacted bioimage analysis and explore the open-source resources available to integrate it into a research project. Finally, we discuss the future of deep learning applied to cell and developmental biology. We analyze how state-of-the-art methodologies have the potential to transform our understanding of biological systems through new image-based analysis and modelling that integrate multimodal inputs in space and time.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDeep LearningDevelopmental BiologyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleSoftwareBioimagingDeep learningImage analysisMicroscopyNeural network

Identifiers

PMID34490888
PMCPMC8451066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.