Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34490810›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical research and opinion2021

Patient perceptions of safety in primary care: a qualitative study to inform care.

Elyse C Lasser, JaAlah-Ai Heughan, Alden Yuanhong Lai, Christina T Yuan, Sydney M Dy, Mark Bittle, Tyler Oberlander, Samantha I Pitts, Jill Marsteller, Susan M Hannum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical research and opinion, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Patient and family engagement interventions in primary care patient safety: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. The public's perceptions of patient safety in healthcare.Israel journal of health policy research · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elyse C LasserDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1758-9822
JaAlah-Ai HeughanDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Alden Yuanhong LaiDepartment of Public Health Policy and Management, New York University School of Global Public Health, NY, USA.
Christina T YuanJohns Hopkins Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sydney M DyDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mark BittleDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Tyler OberlanderNational Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), Washington DC, USA.
Samantha I PittsDivision of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jill MarstellerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Susan M HannumDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

What is Patient Safety in the Medical Home?R01HS024859 · AHRQ · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DY, SYDNEY MORSS · 2016 to 2018
$1.5M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS024859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients' perspectives on patient safety have rarely been incorporated into quality initiatives in primary care. Our objective was to understand the patient perspective on patient safety in patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs). We conducted 12 patient focus groups/interviews in nine sites with 65 patients at a geographically diverse sample of National Committee on Quality Assurance Level 3 recognized PCMHs across three states. Using a patient safety framework, we coded and analyzed interviews for overarching themes and subthemes across patient safety domains. Overarching themes focused on (1) both clear and timely communication with and between clinicians and (2) trust in the care team, including being heard, respected, and treated as a whole person. Other themes important to specific patient safety domains included sharing of and access to information, patient education and patient-centered medication reconciliation process, clear documentation for the diagnostic process, patient-centered comprehensive visits, and timeliness of care. Communication and trust are key to patient perceptions of safe primary care. Focusing on these themes across safety domains may help to make primary care both more patient-centered and safer, and should be considered in future ambulatory safety initiatives.

Indexed as

Patient-Centered CarePrimary Health CareCommunicationHumansPerceptionQualitative Researchcommunicationpatient-centered medical homepatient-centered primary carePatient perspective of safetyqualitative researchtrust

Identifiers

PMID34490810
PMCPMC9721527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.