ArticleHealth services research2021
International comparison of spending and utilization at the end of life for hip fracture patients.
Article in Health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility, acceptability and prognostic value of muscle mass and strength measurement in patients with hip fracture: a systematic review.European geriatric medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Applying the hospital administrative data quality scoring tool in 15 countries.Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia · 2026Article
- International comparison of equity gradients in hospitalizations for ambulatory care sensitive conditions.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Bridging borders: Current trends and future directions in comparative health systems research.Health services research · 2024Article
- Medical costs of Swedish nursing home residents at the end of life: a retrospective observational registry study.BMC geriatrics · 2024Observational
- Association of Handgrip Strength with Hip Fracture and Falls in Community-dwelling Middle-aged and Older Adults: A 4-Year Longitudinal Study.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
- A refined ICD-10 diagnoses-based approach for retrospective analysis of potential palliative care need and coverage in claims data of deceased.SAGE open medicine · 2024Article
- Variation in care for patients presenting with hip fracture in six high-income countries: A cross-sectional cohort study.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2023Article
- A Scoping Review to Assess Risk of Fracture Associated with Anxiolytic Medications.Kansas journal of medicine · 2023Article
- Postsurgery paths and outcomes for hip fracture patients (POST-OP HIP PATHS): a population-based retrospective cohort study protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Developing a minimum common dataset for hip fracture audit to help countries set up national audits that can support international comparisons.The bone & joint journal · 2022Article
- A methodology for identifying high-need, high-cost patient personas for international comparisons.Health services research · 2021Article
- How can we make valid and useful comparisons of different health care systems?Health services research · 2021Article
- An international comparison of long-term care trajectories and spending following hip fracture.Health services research · 2021Article
- International comparison of spending and utilization at the end of life for hip fracture patients.Health services research · 2021Article
- Validation and application of a needs-based segmentation tool for cross-country comparisons.Health services research · 2021Article
- International comparison of patient care trajectories: Insights from the ICCONIC project.Health services research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 7 institutions in 7 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify and explore differences in spending and utilization of key health services at the end of life among hip fracture patients across seven developed countries. DATA SOURCES: Individual-level claims data from the inpatient and outpatient health care sectors compiled by the International Collaborative on Costs, Outcomes, and Needs in Care (ICCONIC). STUDY
designWe retrospectively analyzed utilization and spending from acute hospital care, emergency department, outpatient primary care and specialty physician visits, and outpatient drugs. Patterns of spending and utilization were compared in the last 30, 90, and 180 days across Australia, Canada, England, Germany, New Zealand, Spain, and the United States. We employed linear regression models to measure age- and sex-specific effects within and across countries. In addition, we analyzed hospital-centricity, that is, the days spent in hospital and site of death. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
methodsWe identified patients who sustained a hip fracture in 2016 and died within 12 months from date of admission. PRINCIPAL
findingsResource use, costs, and the proportion of deaths in hospital showed large variability being high in England and Spain, while low in New Zealand. Days in hospital significantly decreased with increasing age in Canada, Germany, Spain, and the United States. Hospital spending near date of death was significantly lower for women in Canada, Germany, and the United States. The age gradient and the sex effect were less pronounced in utilization and spending of emergency care, outpatient care, and drugs.
conclusionsAcross seven countries, we find important variations in end-of-life care for patients who sustained a hip fracture, with some differences explained by sex and age. Our work sheds important insights that may help ongoing health policy discussions on equity, efficiency, and reimbursement in health care systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.