Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34490592›Full record

ArticleInfection2022

16S rDNA PCR for the aetiological diagnosis of culture-negative infective endocarditis.

Vanesa Anton-Vazquez, Rafal Dworakowski, Antonio Cannata, George Amin-Youssef, Margaret Gunning, Alexandros Papachristidis, Phil MacCarthy, Max Baghai, Ranjit Deshpande, Habib Khan and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. ExploringFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. A subacute presentation ofBMJ case reports · 2022
    Article
  13. European heart journal. Case reports · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vanesa Anton-VazquezDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK. v.anton-vazquez@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4414-3017
Rafal DworakowskiDepartment of Cardiology, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
Antonio CannataDepartment of Cardiology, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
George Amin-YoussefDepartment of Cardiology, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
Margaret GunningDepartment of Cardiology, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
Alexandros PapachristidisDepartment of Cardiology, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
Phil MacCarthyDepartment of Cardiology, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
Max BaghaiDepartment of Cardiology, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
Ranjit DeshpandeDepartment of Cardiology, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
Habib KhanDepartment of Cardiology, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
Jonathan ByrneDepartment of Cardiology, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
Amanda FifeDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCulture-negative infective endocarditis (IE) accounts for 7-31% of all cases. Metagenomics has contributed to improving the aetiological diagnosis of IE patients undergoing valve surgery. We assessed the impact of 16S ribosomal DNA gene polymerase chain reaction (16S rDNA PCR) in the aetiological diagnosis of culture-negative IE.

methodsBetween January 2016 and January 2020, clinical data from culture-negative IE patients were reviewed retrospectively. Identification of bacteria was performed using 16S rDNA PCR in heart valve specimens.

results36 out of 313 patients (12%) with culture-negative IE had their valve tissue specimens submitted for 16S rDNA PCR. 16S rDNA PCR detected and identified bacterial nucleic acid in heart valve tissue significantly more frequently compared to valve culture alone 25(70%) vs 5(12%); p < 0.05. Mean age was 57 years (SD 18) and 80% were male. Native and aortic valve were involved in 76% and 52% of cases, respectively. Streptococcus spp. (n 15) were the most commonly detected organisms, followed by bacteria of the HACEK group (Haemophilus parainfluenzae 2, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans 1), nutritionally variant streptococci (Abiotrophia defectiva 2), and one each of Staphylococcus aureus, Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum, Helcococcus kunzii, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Tropheryma whipplei.

conclusion16S rDNA PCR may be a useful diagnostic tool for the identification of the causative organism in culture-negative IE. Efforts towards a shorter turnaround time for results should be consider and further studies assessing the clinical impact of this technique in culture-negative IE are needed.

Indexed as

EndocarditisEndocarditis, BacterialDNA, RibosomalHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolymerase Chain ReactionRetrospective StudiesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, RibosomalRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rDNAInfective endocarditisPCRPolymerase chain reaction

Identifiers

PMID34490592
OpenAlexW3197519576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.