Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34490583›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2021

Blood lipids and risk of colon or rectal cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.

Xuexin Luo, Zhenxing Tu, Hongquan Chen, Jie Ding

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xuexin LuoDepartment of Chinese Traditional Medicine, The Second Hospital of Shaoxing, Shaoxing, Zhejiang, China.
Zhenxing TuDepartment of Hand Surgery, The Second Hospital of Tangshan, Tangshan, Hebei Province, China.
Hongquan ChenDepartment of Bone Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan, Hebei Province, China.
Jie DingCancer Center, The Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 68 Gehu Road, Wujin District, Changzhou, 213164, Jiangsu, China. dingj135@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2464-986X
Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital · CNNorth China University of Science and Technology · CNSecond Hospital of Tangshan · CNShaoxing Second Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecent Mendelian randomization (MR) studies derived inconsistent results of blood lipids' effect on colorectal cancer, and whether the blood lipids' effect on colon and rectal cancer is different is still unknown. Here, we sought to answer these questions.

methodsPrimarily, we employed univariable MR to explore the blood lipids' effect on colon and rectal cancer, including high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), total cholesterol and triglycerides. Then, multivariable MR was also employed to reassess each blood lipid's effect on the two cancers with adjustment of the other lipids. Reverse MR analysis was adopted to determine whether colon or rectal cancer could affect the levels of blood lipids. The Cochrane's Q value was used to evaluate the heterogeneity, and MR-PRESSO was used to appraise the pleiotropy.

resultsGenerally, we did not find any significant result between blood lipids and the colon/rectal cancer after Bonferroni correction in the univariable MR analysis. The multivariable MR analysis also obtained the same results. However, it should be noted that higher total cholesterol level might increase the risk of colon cancer (OR = 1.15 [1.01, 1.31], IVW p value = 0.029) but not rectal cancer (OR = 1.02 [0.85, 1.21], IVW p value = 0.853). Such causal relationship turned insignificant in the multivariable MR. The reverse MR analysis suggested that either colon or rectal cancer could increase the levels of blood lipids.

conclusionWe found no association between blood lipids and risk of colon or rectal cancer, except for a positive association between total cholesterol and colon cancer risk.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsHumansLipidsMendelian Randomization AnalysisRisk FactorsLipidsBlood lipidsColon cancerMendelian randomizationRectal cancerRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID34490583
PMCPMC11801872
OpenAlexW3196342142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.