Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34490477›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine reports2021

Parallel evaluation of cell‑based phage display panning strategies: Optimized selection and depletion steps result in AML blast‑binding consensus antibodies.

Theresa Weber, Sibylle Pscherer, Ulrike Gamerdinger, Andrea Teigler-Schlegel, Natalja Rutz, Wolfgang Blau, Mathias Rummel, Stefan Gattenlöhner, Mehmet Kemal Tur

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Theresa WeberInstitute of Pathology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, D‑35392 Giessen, Germany.
Sibylle PschererInstitute of Pathology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, D‑35392 Giessen, Germany.
Ulrike GamerdingerInstitute of Pathology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, D‑35392 Giessen, Germany.
Andrea Teigler-SchlegelInstitute of Pathology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, D‑35392 Giessen, Germany.
Natalja RutzInstitute of Pathology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, D‑35392 Giessen, Germany.
Wolfgang BlauDepartment for Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Helios Dr Horst Schmidt Kliniken, D‑65199 Wiesbaden, Germany.
Mathias RummelDepartment for Hematology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, D‑35392 Giessen, Germany.
Stefan GattenlöhnerInstitute of Pathology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, D‑35392 Giessen, Germany.
Mehmet Kemal TurInstitute of Pathology, Justus Liebig University Giessen, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, D‑35392 Giessen, Germany.
University of Giessen · DEHelios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phage display technology (PD) is a powerful technique for the generation of tumor‑targeting antibodies. However, there are a number of different selection methods established in different laboratories around the world. Cell‑based PD panning methods using primary tumor cells are particularly heterogeneous between laboratories, which can lead to inconsistent results. Therefore, the present study evaluated different cell‑based PD selection methods regarding their potential to generate acute myeloid leukemia (AML) blast‑binding antibodies. In addition to this evaluation, the present study improved the PD procedure by optimizing selection as well as depletion strategies. To the best of our knowledge, the current study demonstrated for the first time that antigen diversity during the depletion step is of importance for the enrichment of tumor‑targeting phage antibodies. It is demonstrated that medium levels of depletion antigen diversity led to the most promising antibody candidates. In addition, it was determined that purification of blast cells from patients with AML by immunomagnetic separation ameliorated the selection of AML‑binding phages during panning. Furthermore, suggesting a common design‑related mechanism using a 'single‑pot' PD library, such as the well‑known Tomlinson single‑chain fragment variable (scFv) library, the present study identified specific binding consensus phage particles in independent panning procedures. By means of these optimized strategies, four promising AML blast‑binding phage particles were isolated and soluble scFv‑Fc (scFv cloned to a fragment crystallizable of an IgG2a mouse antibody) fusion proteins were produced. These scFv‑Fc antibodies bound the surface of AML blasts and were successfully internalized into their cytoplasm, indicating that they are potential immunoconjugate candidates for AML immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeoplasmAntibody SpecificityBacteriophagesCell Surface Display TechniquesHEK293 CellsHumansImmunotherapyLeukemia, Myeloid, AcutePrimary Cell CultureAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Neoplasmacute myeloid leukemiaconsensus phagedepletion antigen diversityenrichment of blastsinternalizing antibodyphage display technology

Identifiers

PMID34490477
PMCPMC8430305
OpenAlexW3198858763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.