Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34490172›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2021

Group Testing for SARS-CoV-2 Allows for Up to 10-Fold Efficiency Increase Across Realistic Scenarios and Testing Strategies.

Claudio M Verdun, Tim Fuchs, Pavol Harar, Dennis Elbrächter, David S Fischer, Julius Berner, Philipp Grohs, Fabian J Theis, Felix Krahmer

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sample pooling strategies for SARS-CoV-2 detection.Journal of virological methods · 2021
    Review
  15. Heterogeneity Aware Two-Stage Group Testing.IEEE transactions on signal processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Considerations for Pooled Testing of Employees for SARS-CoV-2.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Pooling saliva to increase SARS-CoV-2 testing capacity.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Claudio M VerdunDepartment of Mathematics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Tim FuchsDepartment of Mathematics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Pavol HararResearch Network Data Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Dennis ElbrächterFaculty of Mathematics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
David S FischerInstitute of Computational Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Munich, Germany.
Julius BernerFaculty of Mathematics, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Philipp GrohsResearch Network Data Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Fabian J TheisDepartment of Mathematics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.
Felix KrahmerDepartment of Mathematics, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 3403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2BrazilCOVID-19 TestingHumansPandemicsCOVID-19group testinginformative testingpoolingRT-PCRSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34490172
PMCPMC8416485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.