Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34490065›Full record

ArticleNew microbes and new infections2021

The effect of hemoperfusion on the outcome, clinical and laboratory findings of patients with severe COVID-19: a retrospective study.

A Soleimani, S M Moeini Taba, S Hasibi Taheri, A H Loghman, M Shayestehpour

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in New microbes and new infections, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cost-effectiveness of plasmapheresis and hemoperfusion in COVID-19 survivors: A six-month follow-up analysis after hospital discharge.Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Apheresis and COVID-19 in intensive care unit (ICU).Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A SoleimaniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of MedicineKashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
S M Moeini TabaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of MedicineKashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
S Hasibi TaheriDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of MedicineKashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
A H LoghmanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of MedicineKashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
M ShayestehpourAutoimmune Diseases Research CenterKashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
Kashan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemoperfusion is a method of blood filtering to remove toxins and inflammatory factors. Cytokine storms and high levels of inflammatory factors play a role in the pathogenesis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The present study aims to evaluate the effect of hemoperfusion on the clinical and laboratory findings and outcomes of patients with severe COVID-19. Forty-eight patients with severe COVID-19 and a positive PCR test, who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), participated in the study. All patients were treated by routine treatment protocol for COVID-19. Hemoperfusion was performed for 24 patients in addition to treatment with conventional antiviral therapies. The other 24 patients made up the control group. Demographic data, laboratory findings and patient outcomes before and after treatment were retrospectively collected and analysed. There was no significnt difference in mortality or length of hospital stays between the control group and the hemoperfusion group. The breathing rate (P-vaalue = 0.001) and heart beat rate (P-value = 0.028) of patients decreased after hemoperfusion. The hemoperfusion resulted in a significant increase in the SpO2 levels and a significant decrease in the CRP of patients compared to the conventional treatment (P-value = 0.009). Hemoperfusion can improve respiratory distress. It can reduce the CRP in patients with severe COVID-19 but has no effect on mortality.

Indexed as

COVID-19hemoperfusionoutcomeSARS-CoV-2treatment

Identifiers

PMID34490065
PMCPMC8410636
OpenAlexW3198607983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.