Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34490011›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2021

Multi-Trait Multi-Environment Genomic Prediction of Agronomic Traits in Advanced Breeding Lines of Winter Wheat.

Harsimardeep S Gill, Jyotirmoy Halder, Jinfeng Zhang, Navreet K Brar, Teerath S Rai, Cody Hall, Amy Bernardo, Paul St Amand, Guihua Bai, Eric Olson and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genomic prediction vs. gene-based crop models: a case study on rice trait prediction.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  6. Improving hybrid breeding efficiency in winter oilseed rape under sparse multi-environment testing.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Multi-trait ridge regression BLUP withFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Harsimardeep S GillDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture & Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, United States.
Jyotirmoy HalderDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture & Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, United States.
Jinfeng ZhangDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture & Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, United States.
Navreet K BrarDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture & Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, United States.
Teerath S RaiDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture & Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, United States.
Cody HallDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture & Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, United States.
Amy BernardoDepartment of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Paul St AmandUnited States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Services, Hard Winter Wheat Genetic Research Unit, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Guihua BaiUnited States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Services, Hard Winter Wheat Genetic Research Unit, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Eric OlsonDepartment of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States.
Shaukat AliDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture & Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, United States.
Brent TurnipseedDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture & Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, United States.
Sunish K SehgalDepartment of Agronomy, Horticulture & Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, United States.
South Dakota State University · USAgricultural Research Service · USKansas State University · USMichigan State University · USUnited States Department of Agriculture · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic prediction is a promising approach for accelerating the genetic gain of complex traits in wheat breeding. However, increasing the prediction accuracy (PA) of genomic prediction (GP) models remains a challenge in the successful implementation of this approach. Multivariate models have shown promise when evaluated using diverse panels of unrelated accessions; however, limited information is available on their performance in advanced breeding trials. Here, we used multivariate GP models to predict multiple agronomic traits using 314 advanced and elite breeding lines of winter wheat evaluated in 10 site-year environments. We evaluated a multi-trait (MT) model with two cross-validation schemes representing different breeding scenarios (CV1, prediction of completely unphenotyped lines; and CV2, prediction of partially phenotyped lines for correlated traits). Moreover, extensive data from multi-environment trials (METs) were used to cross-validate a Bayesian multi-trait multi-environment (MTME) model that integrates the analysis of multiple-traits, such as G × E interaction. The MT-CV2 model outperformed all the other models for predicting grain yield with significant improvement in PA over the single-trait (ST-CV1) model. The MTME model performed better for all traits, with average improvement over the ST-CV1 reaching up to 19, 71, 17, 48, and 51% for grain yield, grain protein content, test weight, plant height, and days to heading, respectively. Overall, the empirical analyses elucidate the potential of both the MT-CV2 and MTME models when advanced breeding lines are used as a training population to predict related preliminary breeding lines. Further, we evaluated the practical application of the MTME model in the breeding program to reduce phenotyping cost using a sparse testing design. This showed that complementing METs with GP can substantially enhance resource efficiency. Our results demonstrate that multivariate GS models have a great potential in implementing GS in breeding programs.

Indexed as

BMTMEGBSG × Egenomic predictiongenomic selectionmulti-trait multi-environment genomic predictionwheat breeding

Identifiers

PMID34490011
PMCPMC8416538
OpenAlexW3195881978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.