Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34489965›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2021

Comparison of Neutralizing Dengue Virus B Cell Epitopes and Protective T Cell Epitopes With Those in Three Main Dengue Virus Vaccines.

Josilene Ramos Pinheiro, Esther Camilo Dos Reis, Rayane da Silva Oliveira Souza, Ana Luíza Silva Rocha, Lincoln Suesdek, Vasco Azevedo, Sandeep Tiwari, Beatriz Gonçalves Silva Rocha, Alexander Birbrair, Erick Carvalho Méndez and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Risk of cognitive decline among patients with dengue virus infection: a systematic review.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Josilene Ramos PinheiroLaboratório de Agentes Infecciosos e Vetores, Centro das Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Oeste da Bahia, Bahia, Brazil.
Esther Camilo Dos ReisLaboratório de Agentes Infecciosos e Vetores, Centro das Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Oeste da Bahia, Bahia, Brazil.
Rayane da Silva Oliveira SouzaLaboratório de Agentes Infecciosos e Vetores, Centro das Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Oeste da Bahia, Bahia, Brazil.
Ana Luíza Silva RochaLaboratório de Agentes Infecciosos e Vetores, Centro das Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Oeste da Bahia, Bahia, Brazil.
Lincoln SuesdekLaboratório de Parasitologia, Instituto, Butantan, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vasco AzevedoDepartamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Sandeep TiwariDepartamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Beatriz Gonçalves Silva RochaDepartamento de Patologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Alexander BirbrairDepartamento de Patologia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Erick Carvalho MéndezPrograma de Pós-graduação em Biologia e Biotecnologia de Microrganismos, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Bahia, Brazil.
Wilson Barros LuizPrograma de Pós-graduação em Biologia e Biotecnologia de Microrganismos, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Bahia, Brazil.
Jaime Henrique AmorimLaboratório de Agentes Infecciosos e Vetores, Centro das Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Oeste da Bahia, Bahia, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal do Oeste da Bahia · BRUniversidade Estadual de Santa Cruz · BRInstituto Butantan · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The four serotypes of Dengue virus (DENV1-4) are arboviruses (arthropod-borne viruses) that belong to the

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralConserved SequenceDengueDengue VaccinesDengue VirusEpitopes, B-LymphocyteEpitopes, T-LymphocyteHumansImmunization ProgramsModels, MolecularStructure-Activity RelationshipVaccinationVaccines, SyntheticAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralDengue VaccinesEpitopes, B-LymphocyteEpitopes, T-LymphocyteVaccines, Syntheticdengueimmunization programsimmunoinformaticsprotectionvaccines

Identifiers

PMID34489965
PMCPMC8417696
OpenAlexW3194259233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.