Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34489859›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2021

Detecting Novel Ototoxins and Potentiation of Ototoxicity by Disease Settings.

Allison B Coffin, Robert Boney, Jordan Hill, Cong Tian, Peter S Steyger

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Hair cell toxicology: With the help of a little fish.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Mechanisms of Ototoxicity and Otoprotection.Otolaryngologic clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Allison B CoffinWashington State University Vancouver, Vancouver, WA, United States.
Robert BoneyRewire Neuro, Portland, OR, United States.
Jordan HillWashington State University Vancouver, Vancouver, WA, United States.
Cong TianDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, United States.
Peter S SteygerDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, United States.
Creighton University · USWashington State University Vancouver · US

Funding

Understanding the progression of hearing loss in an endolymphatic hydrops modelP20GM139762 · NIGMS · CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY · PI Hui Hong · 2021 to 2026
$16.1M
HAIR CELL RESPONSES TO OTOTOXIC DRUGSR01DC004555 · NIDCD · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI STEYGER, PETER STEPHEN · 2001 to 2020
$6.6M
Clinical factors in aminoglycoside-induced ototoxicityR01DC016680 · NIDCD · CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY · PI STEYGER, PETER STEPHEN · 2019 to 2023
$3.3M
Auditory Processing by Neural Circuits in the Inferior ColliculusR56DC016880 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ROBERTS, MICHAEL THOMAS · 2018 to 2018
$312k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004555NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016680NIDCD NIH HHS R56 DC016880NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM139762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over 100 drugs and chemicals are associated with permanent hearing loss, tinnitus, and vestibular deficits, collectively known as ototoxicity. The ototoxic potential of drugs is rarely assessed in pre-clinical drug development or during clinical trials, so this debilitating side-effect is often discovered as patients begin to report hearing loss. Furthermore, drug-induced ototoxicity in adults, and particularly in elderly patients, may go unrecognized due to hearing loss from a variety of etiologies because of a lack of baseline assessments immediately prior to novel therapeutic treatment. During the current pandemic, there is an intense effort to identify new drugs or repurpose FDA-approved drugs to treat COVID-19. Several potential COVID-19 therapeutics are known ototoxins, including chloroquine (CQ) and lopinavir-ritonavir, demonstrating the necessity to identify ototoxic potential in existing and novel medicines. Furthermore, several factors are emerging as potentiators of ototoxicity, such as inflammation (a hallmark of COVID-19), genetic polymorphisms, and ototoxic synergy with co-therapeutics, increasing the necessity to evaluate a drug's potential to induce ototoxicity under varying conditions. Here, we review the potential of COVID-19 therapies to induce ototoxicity and factors that may compound their ototoxic effects. We then discuss two models for rapidly detecting the potential for ototoxicity: mammalian auditory cell lines and the larval zebrafish lateral line. These models offer considerable value for pre-clinical drug development, including development of COVID-19 therapies. Finally, we show the validity of

Indexed as

cell linesCOVID-19in silicoin vitroin vivonovel ototoxinsscreeningzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID34489859
PMCPMC8418111
OpenAlexW3194494770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.