ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021
Measuring Interoception: The CARdiac Elevation Detection Task.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oscillatory Markers of Interoceptive Attention: Beta Suppression as a Neural Signature of Heartbeat Processing.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- Validity and Reliability of the Heart Rate Matching Task: A Novel Measure of Heart Rate Estimation.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- Breaking through the mind-body divide: patient priorities for interoception research.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- The Relationship Between Schizophrenia and Interoceptive Accuracy and Sensitivity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2025Review
- No differences between remote and laboratory-based testing of cardiac interoceptive accuracy using the phase adjustment task.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Heart Rate Variability and Interoception in Periodic Limb Movements in Sleep: Interference with Psychiatric Disorders?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Interoceptive attention and mood in daily life: an experience-sampling study.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Cardiac interoception in the museum: A novel measure of experience.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Validation of the shortened 24-item multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness, version 2 (Brief MAIA-2).Scientific reports · 2023Article
- A Primer on Interoception and its Importance in Psychiatry.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023Review
- Depersonalization disorder as a systematic downregulation of interoceptive signals.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interoception has increasingly been the focus of psychiatric research, due to its hypothesized role in mental health. Existing interoceptive tasks either suffer from important methodological limitations, impacting their validity, or are burdensome and require specialized equipment, which limits their usage in vulnerable populations. We report on the development of the CARdiac Elevation Detection (CARED) task. Participants' heart rate is recorded by a wearable device connected to a mobile application. Notifications are sent to participants' mobile throughout the day over a period of 4 weeks. Participants are asked to state whether their heart rate is higher than usual, rate their confidence and describe the activity they were involved in when the notification occurred. Data (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.