Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34489624›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021

Cortical Re-organization After Traumatic Brain Injury Elicited Using Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy: A Case Report.

Matija Milosevic, Tomoya Nakanishi, Atsushi Sasaki, Akiko Yamaguchi, Taishin Nomura, Milos R Popovic, Kimitaka Nakazawa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. [A review of functional electrical stimulation based on brain-computer interface].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Traumatic brain injuries: a neuropsychological review.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Matija MilosevicGraduate School of Engineering Science, Department of Mechanical Science and Bioengineering, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Tomoya NakanishiDepartment of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi SasakiDepartment of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Akiko YamaguchiDepartment of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Taishin NomuraGraduate School of Engineering Science, Department of Mechanical Science and Bioengineering, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Milos R PopovicInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kimitaka NakazawaDepartment of Life Sciences, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tokyo University of the Arts · JPOsaka University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPToronto Rehabilitation Institute · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional electrical stimulation therapy (FEST) can improve motor function after neurological injuries. However, little is known about cortical changes after FEST and weather it can improve motor function after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Our study examined cortical changes and motor improvements in one male participant with chronic TBI suffering from mild motor impairment affecting the right upper-limb during 3-months of FEST and during 3-months follow-up. In total, 36 sessions of FEST were applied to enable upper-limb grasping and reaching movements. Short-term assessments carried out using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) showed reduced cortical silent period (CSP), indicating cortical and/or subcortical inhibition after each intervention. At the same time, no changes in motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were observed. Long-term assessments showed increased MEP corticospinal excitability after 12-weeks of FEST, which seemed to remain during both follow-ups, while no changes in CSP were observed. Similarly, long-term assessments using TMS mapping showed larger hand MEP area in the primary motor cortex (M1) after 12-weeks of FEST as well as during both follow-ups. Corroborating TMS results, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data showed M1 activations increased during hand grip and finger pinch tasks after 12-weeks of FEST, while gradual reduction of activity compared to after the intervention was seen during follow-ups. Widespread changes were seen not only in the M1, but also sensory, parietal rostroventral, supplementary motor, and premotor areas in both contralateral and ipsilateral hemispheres, especially during the finger pinch task. Drawing test performance showed improvements after the intervention and during follow-ups. Our findings suggest that task-specific and repetitive FEST can effectively increase cortical activations by integrating voluntary motor commands and sensorimotor network through functional electrical stimulation (FES). Overall, our results demonstrated cortical re-organization in an individual with chronic TBI after FEST.

Indexed as

brain injuryfunctional electrical stimulationfunctional electrical stimulation therapyneuroplasticityrehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID34489624
PMCPMC8417438
OpenAlexW3193441921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.