Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34489559›Full record

ArticleLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2021

Development of an exosomal gene signature to detect residual disease in dogs with osteosarcoma using a novel xenograft platform and machine learning.

Kelly M Makielski, Alicia J Donnelly, Ali Khammanivong, Milcah C Scott, Andrea R Ortiz, Dana C Galvan, Hirotaka Tomiyasu, Clarissa Amaya, Kristin A Ward, Alexa Montoya and 11 more

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Kelly M Makielski *Animal Cancer Care and Research Program, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA. makie001@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7878-2370
Alicia J Donnelly *Animal Cancer Care and Research Program, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Ali Khammanivong *Animal Cancer Care and Research Program, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Milcah C ScottAnimal Cancer Care and Research Program, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Andrea R OrtizTexas Tech Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA.
Dana C GalvanTexas Tech Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA.
Hirotaka TomiyasuAnimal Cancer Care and Research Program, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Clarissa AmayaTexas Tech Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA.
Kristin A WardTexas Tech Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA.
Alexa MontoyaTexas Tech Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA.
John R GarbeMinnesota Supercomputing Institute, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Lauren J MillsMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Gary R CutterDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Joelle M FengerDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
William C KisseberthDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Timothy D O'BrienAnimal Cancer Care and Research Program, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Brenda J WeigelAnimal Cancer Care and Research Program, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Logan G SpectorMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Brad A BryanTexas Tech Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA.
Subbaya SubramanianAnimal Cancer Care and Research Program, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2544-480X
Jaime F ModianoAnimal Cancer Care and Research Program, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6398-7648
University of Minnesota · USTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · USBaylor College of Medicine · USThe University of Texas at El Paso · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of New Mexico · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jennifer A. Woyach · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Jeffrey S. Miller · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
The OSU Center for Clinical and Translational Science: Advancing Today's Discoveries to Improve HealthUL1TR002733 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RINGEL, MATTHEW D · 2018 to 2022
$28.9M
TRAINING GRANT IN MICROBIOLOGY/CANCER RESEARCHT32CA009138 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Scott M. Dehm · 1985 to 2026
$11.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002733NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteosarcoma has a guarded prognosis. A major hurdle in developing more effective osteosarcoma therapies is the lack of disease-specific biomarkers to predict risk, prognosis, or therapeutic response. Exosomes are secreted extracellular microvesicles emerging as powerful diagnostic tools. However, their clinical application is precluded by challenges in identifying disease-associated cargo from the vastly larger background of normal exosome cargo. We developed a method using canine osteosarcoma in mouse xenografts to distinguish tumor-derived from host-response exosomal messenger RNAs (mRNAs). The model allows for the identification of canine osteosarcoma-specific gene signatures by RNA sequencing and a species-differentiating bioinformatics pipeline. An osteosarcoma-associated signature consisting of five gene transcripts (SKA2, NEU1, PAF1, PSMG2, and NOB1) was validated in dogs with spontaneous osteosarcoma by real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR), while a machine learning model assigned dogs into healthy or disease groups. Serum/plasma exosomes were isolated from 53 dogs in distinct clinical groups ("healthy", "osteosarcoma", "other bone tumor", or "non-neoplastic disease"). Pre-treatment samples from osteosarcoma cases were used as the training set, and a validation set from post-treatment samples was used for testing, classifying as "osteosarcoma detected" or "osteosarcoma-NOT detected". Dogs in a validation set whose post-treatment samples were classified as "osteosarcoma-NOT detected" had longer remissions, up to 15 months after treatment. In conclusion, we identified a gene signature predictive of molecular remissions with potential applications in the early detection and minimal residual disease settings. These results provide proof of concept for our discovery platform and its utilization in future studies to inform cancer risk, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic response.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorDogsExosomesFemaleHumansMachine LearningMiceMice, NudeNeoplasm TransplantationOsteosarcomaPrimary Cell CulturePrognosisStromal CellsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID34489559
OpenAlexW3196450861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.