Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34489543›Full record

ArticleBritish dental journal2021

Patient-reported outcome measure for children and young people with amelogenesis imperfecta.

Alexandra Lyne, Susan Parekh, Nikita Patel, Fiona Lafferty, Catriona Brown, Helen Rodd, Joana Monteiro

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British dental journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluating a condition-specific PROM for amelogenesis imperfecta in children and young people: insights from patients and clinicians.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Article
  2. A UK-based consensus on clinical decision flowcharts for managing childhood amelogenesis imperfecta in the permanent dentition.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Establishment of a clinical network for children with amelogenesis imperfecta and dentinogenesis imperfecta in the UK: 4-year experience.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Patient-reported outcome measures for children and adolescents having dental bleaching in the UK.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2022
    Article
  10. PROMs in AI patients.British dental journal · 2022
    Article
  11. Amelogenesis imperfecta. case report.Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra LynePaediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK. alexandra.lyne@nhs.net.
Susan ParekhPaediatric Dentistry, Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK.
Nikita PatelPaediatric Dentistry, Guy´s & St Thomas´ Hospitals, Westminster Bridge Road, London, UK.
Fiona LaffertyPaediatric Dentistry Department, Glasgow Dental Hospital and School, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, G2 3JZ, UK.
Catriona BrownPaediatric Dentistry, Birmingham Dental Hospital, Birmingham, B5 7EG, UK.
Helen RoddUnit of Oral Health, Dentistry and Society, School of Clinical, Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Claremont Crescent, Sheffield, S10 2TA, UK.
Joana MonteiroPaediatric Dentistry, Charles Clifford Dental Hospital, Wellesley Road, Sheffield, S10 2SZ, UK.
Eastman Dental Hospital · GBBirmingham Dental Hospital · GBCharles Clifford Dental Hospital · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) is a genetic enamel defect that can affect both the primary and permanent dentition. It has a range of clinical phenotypes, and children and young people often present with challenging oral health needs. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can identify key patient concerns.Methods This was a multi-centre service evaluation across several specialist paediatric dentistry services in the UK. A PROM questionnaire was created with clinician and patient input, through peer review with the national AI Clinical Excellence Network, as well as piloting the PROM with ten children and young people with AI. The final PROM questionnaire was distributed to all patients with AI attending each unit between January and March 2020.Results Sixty children and young people (aged 5-17 years) across four specialist units participated, with 72% reporting that they 'often' or 'sometimes' experienced pain or sensitivity and 76% reporting that they 'often' or 'sometimes' felt unhappy with the way their teeth look. Of the patients who were post-treatment, 81% indicated that they were happy with their teeth, compared to just 41% of patients who were mid-treatment and 33% of patients who were pre-treatment.Conclusion Children and young people with AI experience a range of issues related to their function and psychosocial wellbeing. This simple PROM demonstrates the range of issues this group of patients face, and could be used to monitor an individual's progress to ensure that treatment is planned to address the patient's individual concerns and needs.

Identifiers

PMID34489543
PMCPMC8420961
OpenAlexW3196371041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.