Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34489297›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Treatment of early-stage breast cancer with percutaneous thermal ablation, an open-label randomised phase 2 screening trial: rationale and design of the THERMAC trial.

Elles M F van de Voort, Gerson M Struik, Linetta B Koppert, Adriaan Moelker, Reno Debets, Glenn Yo, Maura J P V Macco, Renata H J A Sinke, Martine Franckena, Erwin Birnie and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Ablative Therapies for Breast Cancer: State of Art.Technology in cancer research & treatment
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Elles M F van de VoortDepartment of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands e.vandevoort@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-2392-9763
Gerson M StruikDepartment of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Linetta B KoppertDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Adriaan MoelkerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Reno DebetsLaboratory of Tumor Immunology, Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Glenn YoDepartment of Radiology, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Maura J P V MaccoDepartment of Radiology, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Renata H J A SinkeDepartment of Pathology, Pathan B.V, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Martine FranckenaDepartment of Radiotherapy, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erwin BirnieDepartment of Statistics and Education, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Cornelis VerhoefDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Taco M A L KlemDepartment of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLSint Franciscus Gasthuis · NLPathoFinder (Netherlands) · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBreast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy worldwide but almost half of the patients have an excellent prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of 98%-99%. These patients could potentially be treated with thermal ablation to avoid surgical excision, reduce treatment-related morbidity and increase patients' quality of life without jeopardising treatment effectiveness. Previous studies showed highest complete ablation rates for radiofrequency, microwave and cryoablation. However, due to heterogeneity among studies, it is unknown which of these three techniques should be selected for a phase 3 comparative study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The aim of this phase 2 screening trial is to determine the efficacy rate of radiofrequency, microwave and cryoablation with the intention to select one treatment for further testing in a phase 3 trial. Additionally, exploratory data are obtained for the phase 3 trial. The design is a multicentre open-label randomised phase 2 screening trial. Patients with unifocal, invasive breast cancer with a maximum diameter of 2 cm without lymph node or distant metastases are included. Triple negative, Bloom-Richardson grade 3 tumours and patients with an indication for neoadjuvant chemotherapy will be excluded. Included patients will be allocated to receive one of the three thermal ablation techniques. Three months later surgical excision will be performed to determine the efficacy of thermal ablation. Treatment efficacy in terms of complete ablation rate will be assessed with CK 8/18 and H&E staining. Secondary outcomes include feasibility of the techniques in an outpatient setting, accuracy of MRI for complete ablation, patient satisfaction, adverse events, side effects, cosmetic outcome, system usability and immune response. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study protocol was approved by Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Study results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL9205 (www.trialregister.nl); Pre-results.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicNeoadjuvant TherapyQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcomebreast imagingbreast surgerybreast tumoursclinical trialsquality in health caresurgical pathology

Identifiers

PMID34489297
PMCPMC8422491
OpenAlexW3198051684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.