Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34489282›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of enhanced informed consent compared to standard informed consent to improve patient understanding of early phase oncology clinical trials (CONSENT).

Abhijit Pal, Sarah Stapleton, Christina Yap, Julia Lai-Kwon, Robert Daly, Dimitrios Magkos, Bindumalini Rao Baikady, Anna Minchom, Udai Banerji, Johann De Bono and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04407676 (A Randomised Controlled Trial of Enhanced Informed Consent Compared to Standard Informed Consent To Improve Patient Understanding of Early Phase Oncology Clinical Trials), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04407676 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Randomised Controlled Trial of Enhanced Informed Consent Compared to Standard Informed Consent To Improve Patient Understanding of Early Phase Oncology Clinical Trials

TypeinterventionalSponsorRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustRan2020 to 2023Enrolled34ConditionsSolid NeoplasmsArmsSummary PIS and Online Video Modules
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Abhijit PalInstitute of Cancer Research, London, UK abhijit.pal@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-4600-6569
Sarah StapletonDrug Development Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital Sutton, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1579-9447
Christina YapCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6715-2514
Julia Lai-KwonInstitute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Robert DalyInstitute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Dimitrios MagkosInstitute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Bindumalini Rao BaikadyInstitute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Anna MinchomInstitute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Udai BanerjiInstitute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Johann De BonoInstitute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Deme KarikiosThe University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Frances BoyleThe University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Juanita LopezInstitute of Cancer Research, London, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 22897Cancer Research UK 25354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEarly phase cancer clinical trials have become increasingly complicated in terms of patient selection and trial procedures-this is reflected in the increasing length of participant information sheets (PIS). Informed consent for early phase clinical trials has been contentious due to the potential ethical issues associated with performing experimental research on a terminally ill population which has exhausted standard treatment options. Empirical studies have demonstrated significant gaps in patient understanding regarding the nature and intent of these trials. This study aims to test whether enhanced informed consent for patient education can improve patient scores on a validated questionnaire testing clinical trial comprehension. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a randomised controlled trial that will allocate patients who are eligible to participate in one of four investigator-initiated clinical trials at the Royal Marsden Drug Development Unit to either a standard arm or an experimental arm, stratified by age and educational level. The standard arm will involve the full length trial PIS, followed by electronic or paper administration of the Quality of Informed Consent Questionnaire Parts A and B (QuIC-A and QuIC-B). The experimental arm will involve the full length trial PIS, exposure to a two-page study aid and 10 online educational videos, followed by administration of the QuIC-A and QuIC-B. The primary endpoint will be the difference (using a one-sided two-sample t-test) in the QuIC-A score, which measures objective understanding, between the standard and experimental arm. Accrual target is at least 17 patients per arm to detect an 8 point difference (80% power, alpha 0.05). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was granted by the National Health Service Health Research Authority on 15 June 2020-IRAS Project ID 277065, Protocol Number CCR5165, REC Reference 20/EE/0155. Results will be disseminated via publication in a relevant journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04407676; Pre-results.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsHumansInformed ConsentRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSARS-CoV-2State MedicineTreatment Outcomeclinical trialsmedical ethicsoncology

Identifiers

PMID34489282
PMCPMC8422487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.