ArticleBMJ open2021
Comparison between Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido in the myocardial protection - Cardioplegia Trial: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07426237 (Effect of the Addition of Adenosine on Myocardial Protection During Cardiopulmonary Bypass), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of the Addition of Adenosine on Myocardial Protection During Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Custodiol Versus Del Nido Cardioplegia in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Repair-a Propensity Score-Matched Study.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Myocardial Protection Efficacy of Custodiol, Del Nido, and Cold Intermittent Blood Cardioplegia in Arterial Switch Operation.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Myocardial Protection in Prolonged Aortic Cross-Clamp Times: Del Nido and HTK Cardioplegia in Adult Cardiac Surgery.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Signaling Pathways (TNF-α-NF-κB, TLR2-TLR4 as well as ROS-MDA) and Cardiac Damages during Cardiac Surgeries (Coronary Stenting, Permanent Pacemaker Implantations, Radiofrequency Ablations).Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Myocardial protection: comparing histological effects of single-dose cardioplegic solutions-study protocol for a secondary analysis of the CARDIOPLEGIA trial.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMyocardial protection is essential for successful cardiac surgery, and the search for an ideal cardioplegic solution has continued since its beginning. In this context, Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido are single-dose cardioplegic solutions with good safety profiles and great relevance in modern surgical practice. While these solutions have all been evaluated for their impact on patient outcomes independently, limited research exists comparing them directly. Thus, the present study aims to examine the effects of these cardioplegic solutions on myocardial protection and clinical outcomes in adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. The assessment of the increase in myocardial injury biomarkers in patients submitted to all treatment methods may be considered a major strength of our study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a clinical trial study protocol that will compare myocardial protection and clinical outcomes among three patient groups based on which cardioplegic solution was used. Patients will be randomised to receive del Nido (n=30), modified del Nido (n=30) or Custodiol (n=30). Myocardial injury biomarkers will be measured at the baseline and 2 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours after the cardiopulmonary bypass. Clinical outcomes will be assessed during the trans operative period and the intensive care unit stay, in addition to other haematological parameters. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol and its related documents were approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição, Brazil, registered under no. 4.029.545. The findings of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal in the related field. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: RBR-7g5s66.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.