Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34489272›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Insight into the process of postpartum care utilisation and in-home support among vulnerable women in the Netherlands: an in-depth qualitative exploration.

Lyzette T Laureij, Marije van der Hulst, Jacqueline Lagendijk, Jasper V Been, Hiske E Ernst-Smelt, Arie Franx, Marjolein Lugtenberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Early Maternal Caregiving Capacities in Highly Vulnerable, Multi-Problem Families.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lyzette T LaureijDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6342-7528
Marije van der HulstDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jacqueline LagendijkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7178-8910
Jasper V BeenDepartment of Paediatrics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Hiske E Ernst-SmeltDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Arie FranxDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marjolein LugtenbergDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands m.lugtenberg@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo gain insight into the process of postpartum care utilisation and in-home support among vulnerable women. DESIGN, METHOD, PARTICIPANTS AND

settingA qualitative interview study was conducted among 23 pregnant and postpartum vulnerable women in the Netherlands, following a grounded theory approach. Women were determined as vulnerable by their healthcare providers. Theoretical sampling of participants was applied and was alternated by data analysis to include information-rich cases until saturation was achieved.

resultsA conceptual framework of postpartum care utilisation was generated consisting of three phases: pregnancy, early postpartum period and late postpartum period. Within these phases, information provision, parenting self-efficacy and social network were identified as overarching themes. Perceived inadequate information on content of postpartum care posed a major barrier to forming realistic expectations during pregnancy and hindered its utilisation. Low self-efficacy facilitated postpartum care utilisation. All women experienced increased self-efficacy during and after postpartum care. Support from a social network influenced expectations regarding the added value of postpartum care during pregnancy, and lowered actual utilisation during the postpartum period. The costs of postpartum care and the role of the maternity care assistant acted as general barriers or facilitators influencing the three overarching themes and therefore postpartum care utilisation indirectly.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that postpartum care utilisation among vulnerable women may be improved by considering the particular phase and relevant themes applying to individual women, and adapt care accordingly. We recommend to provide comprehensive, understandable information and to emphasise the gains of postpartum care in improving self-efficacy for vulnerable women. Moreover, involving a woman's social network in postpartum care may add value to this care for this population.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesPostnatal CareFemaleHumansNetherlandsPostpartum PeriodPregnancyQualitative Researchobstetricsprimary carepublic healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID34489272
PMCPMC8422309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.