Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34489266›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Senior medical students as assistants in medicine in COVID-19 crisis: a realist evaluation protocol.

Lynn V Monrouxe, Peter Hockey, Priya Khanna, Christiane Klinner, Lise Mogensen, D A O'Mara, Abbey Roach, Stephen Tobin, Jennifer Ann Davids

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lynn V MonrouxeFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4895-1812
Peter HockeyFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Priya KhannaSydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Christiane KlinnerFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Lise MogensenSchool of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith South, New South Wales, Australia.
D A O'MaraSydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abbey RoachResearch and Education Network, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Stephen TobinSchool of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Penrith South, New South Wales, Australia.
Jennifer Ann DavidsResearch and Education Network, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia jennifer.davids@health.nsw.gov.au.ORCID 0000-0003-0861-9994

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe assistant in medicine is a new and paid role for final-year medical students that has been established in New South Wales, Australia, as part of the surge workforce management response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Eligibility requires the applicant to be a final-year medical student in an Australian Medical Council-accredited university and registered with the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency. While there are roles with some similarities to the assistant in medicine role, such as assistantships (the UK) and physician assistants adopted internationally, this is completely new in Australia. Little is known about the functionality and success factors of this role within the health practitioner landscape, particularly within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the complexity of this role, a realist approach to evaluation has been undertaken as described in this protocol, which sets out a study design spanning from August 2020 to June 2021. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The intention of conducting a realist review is to identify the circumstances and mechanisms that determine the outcomes of the assistant in medicine intervention. We will start by developing an initial programme theory to explore the potential function of the assistant in medicine role through realist syntheses of critically appraised summaries of existing literature using relevant databases and journals. Other data sources such as interviews and surveys with key stakeholders will contribute to the refinements of the programme theory. Using this method, we will develop a set of hypotheses on how and why the Australian assistants in medicine intervention might 'work' to achieve a variety of outcomes based on examples of related international interventions. These hypotheses will be tested against the qualitative and quantitative evidence gathered from all relevant stakeholders. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval for the larger study was obtained from the Western Sydney Local Health District (2020/ETH01745). The findings of this review will provide useful information for hospital managers, academics and policymakers, who can apply the findings in their context when deciding how to implement and support the introduction of assistants in medicine into the health system. We will publish our findings in reports to policymakers, peer-reviewed journals and international conferences.

Indexed as

COVID-19Students, MedicalAustraliaHumansPandemicsReview Literature as TopicSARS-CoV-2COVID-19health policyhuman resource managementmedical education & training

Identifiers

PMID34489266
PMCPMC8423518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.