Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34489162›Full record

ReviewBiologicals : journal of the International Association of Biological Standardization2021

Animal experiments show impact of vaccination on reduction of SARS-CoV-2 virus circulation: A model for vaccine development?

J Vandeputte, P Van Damme, J Neyts, J C Audonnet, M Baay, P Neels

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biologicals : journal of the International Association of Biological Standardization, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

J VandeputteInternational Alliance for Biological Standardization, Geneve, Switzerland; International Alliance for Biological Standardization Europe, Lyon, France. Electronic address: joris.vandeputte@iabs.org.
P Van DammeCentre for the Evaluation of Vaccination and Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
J NeytsRega Institute for Medical Research, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
J C AudonnetBoehringer Ingelheim Animal Health, Saint Priest, France.
M BaayP95 Epidemiology & Pharmacovigilance, Leuven, Belgium.
P NeelsInternational Alliance for Biological Standardization, Geneve, Switzerland; International Alliance for Biological Standardization Europe, Lyon, France.
International Alliance for Biological Standardization · CHDépartement Santé Animale · FRRega Institute for Medical Research · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the pre-clinical phase, SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were tested in animal models, including exposure trials, to investigate protection against SARS-CoV-2. These studies paved the way for clinical development. The objective of our review was to provide an overview of published animal exposure results, focussing on the capacity of vaccines to reduce/prevent viral shedding.

methodUsing Medline, we retrieved eighteen papers on eight different vaccine platforms in four animal models. Data were extracted on presence/absence of viral RNA in nose, throat, or lungs, and neutralizing antibody levels in the blood.

resultsAll vaccines showed a tendency of reduced viral load after exposure. Particularly nasal swab results are likely to give an indication about the impact on virus excretion in the environment. Similarly, the reduction or prevention of viral replication in the bronchoalveolar environment might be related with disease prevention, explaining the high efficacy in clinical trials. DISCUSSION: Although it remains difficult to compare the results directly, the potential for a strong reduction of transmission was shown, indicating that the animal models predicted what is observed in the field after large scale human vaccination. This merits further attention for standardization of exposure experiments, with the intention to speed up future vaccine development.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesVaccinationAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralHumansSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesAnimal modelCOVID-19Exposure experimentsVaccine development

Identifiers

PMID34489162
PMCPMC8414133
OpenAlexW3196457264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.