ArticleJournal of eating disorders2021
Identification of high risk and early stage eating disorders: first validation of a digital screening tool.
Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Identifying Eating Disorders in Adolescents and Adults Living With Higher Weight: An Updated Systematic Review of Questionnaire Diagnostic Accuracy.The International journal of eating disorders · 2026Pooled it
- The use and misuse of the SCOFF screening measure over two decades: a systematic literature review.Eating and weight disorders : EWD · 2024Pooled it
- Implementing Diabetes Eating Problem Survey - Revised in pediatric type 1 diabetes care: Clinician reflections on systematic screening and multidisciplinary management.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026Article
- Psychological Landscape of Eating Disorders: A Study of Self-Control, Mood, and Personality Traits in Adults.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2026Article
- Bulimia nervosa.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026Review
- Progressing Cross-Sector Collaboration for People With Eating Disorders and Higher Weight: Priority Actions From an Expert Roundtable Using a Modified Nominal Group Technique.The Medical journal of Australia · 2026Article
- Prevalence and associated factors of eating disorders' risk among Alexandria University medical students.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Prospective bidirectional associations between social media use, body dissatisfaction, and disordered eating: predicting exacerbation and maintenance among young adults.Journal of eating disorders · 2026Article
- Leveraging Technology to Enhance Eating Disorder Treatment Outcomes.The Psychiatric clinics of North America · 2026Review
- Network analysis of eating disorders (NAMED): an exploratory study of symptom configuration at different stages of illness.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- Broad considerations for improving eating disorder care: a lived experience and quality improvement perspective.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- Validated and culturally specific screening tools and early response programs for the detection and prevention of eating disorders among First Nations peoples in Australia: a scoping review.Journal of eating disorders · 2025Article
- Recruitment of Adolescents to Virtual Clinical Trials: Recruitment Results From the Health4Me Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2024Article
- Enhanced recovery support for people with eating disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic: quality improvement using a web-based, stepped-care programme in Canada.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- Towards a youth mental health paradigm: a perspective and roadmap.Molecular psychiatry · 2023Review
- A Narrative Review of Early Intervention for Eating Disorders: Barriers and Facilitators.Adolescent health, medicine and therapeutics · 2023Review
- My Diet Study: protocol for a two-part observational, longitudinal, psycho-biological study of dieting in Australian youth.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Eating Disorders in Hospitalized School-Aged Children and Adolescents during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study of Discharge Records in Developmental Ages in Italy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- A healthy lifestyle text message intervention for adolescents: protocol for the Health4Me randomized controlled trial.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Screening, assessment and diagnosis in the eating disorders: findings from a rapid review.Journal of eating disorders · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEating disorders are amongst the deadliest of all mental disorders, however detection and early intervention rates remain extremely low. Current standardised screening questionnaires can be arduous or confronting and are ill-validated for online use, despite a universal shift to digital healthcare. The present study describes the development and pilot validation of a novel digital screening tool (the InsideOut Institute-Screener) for high risk and early stage eating disorders to drive early intervention and reduced morbidity.
methodsWe utilised a mixed cross-sectional and repeated measures longitudinal survey research design to assess symptom severity and recognised parameters of statistical validity. Participants were recruited through social media and traditional advertising, and through MTurk. An Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) global score of 2.3 and assessment of eating disorder behaviours was used to determine probable ED. 1346 participants aged 14-74 (mean [SE] age 26.60 [11.14] years; 73.8% female, 22.6% male) completed the survey battery. 19% were randomised to two-week follow-up for reliability analysis.
resultsStrong positive correlations between the IOI-S and both the EDE-Q global (r CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The present study provides excellent initial support for the psychometric validity of the InsideOut Institute digital screening tool, which has the potential to streamline early intervention in the hopes of reducing current high morbidity and mortality. Further validation should be undertaken in known clinical populations. Eating disorders are amongst the deadliest of all mental disorders, however detection and early intervention rates remain extremely low. The present study describes the initial psychometric validation of a novel digital screening tool (the InsideOut Institute Screener) for high risk and early stage eating disorders, for self-referral and/or use in primary care. 1346 participants aged 14-74 of all genders completed a survey battery designed to assess common parameters of statistical validity. Strong support was found for the screener's ability to accurately measure eating disorder risk and symptomatology. The screener was highly positively correlated with a well known and extensively validated long form self-report questionnaire for eating disorder symptomatology. This study is a pilot validation and the genesis of a project that aims ultimately to drive early intervention leading to reduced morbidity and mortality rates in this illness group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.