Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34488851›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

Patient perceptions of the challenges of recruitment to a renal randomised trial registry: a pilot questionnaire-based study.

Ellen Murphy, Aoife O'Keeffe, Niamh O Shea, Eva Long, Joseph A Eustace, Frances Shiely

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ellen MurphyTRAMS (Trials Research and Methodologies Unit), HRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Aoife O'KeeffeTRAMS (Trials Research and Methodologies Unit), HRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Niamh O SheaTRAMS (Trials Research and Methodologies Unit), HRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Eva LongDepartment of Nephrology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Joseph A EustaceTRAMS (Trials Research and Methodologies Unit), HRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Frances ShielyTRAMS (Trials Research and Methodologies Unit), HRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. f.shiely@ucc.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0969-8321
University College Cork · IECork University Hospital · IE

Funding

Health Research Board TMRN-2017-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for demonstrating the efficacy of new therapies. However, issues of external validity often affect result application to real-world settings. Using registries to conduct RCTs is a reasonably new practice, but is appealing because it combines the benefits of both observational studies and RCTs. There is limited literature on patient motivators, barriers, and consent to registries for conducting RCTs. The purpose of our study was to establish the factors that motivate and/or inhibit patients from joining a registry for RCTs and to determine what information matters to patients when making an enrolment decision to participate in such a registry.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study at a dialysis centre in Southwest Ireland representing a catchment patient population of approximately 430,000. Quantitative data were coded and analysed in SPSS (v16). Descriptive statistics were produced, and open-ended questions were analysed by thematic analysis.

resultsEighty-seven patients completed the questionnaire. Reasons for participation in a registry included personal and altruistic benefits. Barriers to participation were time and travel requirements associated with registry participation, data safety concerns, risks, side effects, and concerns that registry participation would impact current treatment. Although 29.8% of patients expressed concern regarding their data being stored in a registry, 79.3% were still willing to consent to have their data uploaded and stored in a registry for conducting RCTs. It was important to patients to have their GP (general practitioner) involved in the decision to participate, despite little day-to-day contact with their GP for renal dialysis management.

conclusionChallenges to recruitment to registries for RCTs exist, but addressing the identified concerns of potential participants may aid patients in making a more informed enrolment decision and may improve recruitment to registries, and by extension, to RCTs conducted using the registry.

Indexed as

PerceptionHumansIrelandPatient SelectionPilot ProjectsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRegistriesSurveys and QuestionnairesRecruitmentRegistry-based randomised controlled trialsRenal dialysisTrial methodology

Identifiers

PMID34488851
PMCPMC8420031
OpenAlexW3196814457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.