ReviewBiomedical engineering online2021
Robotic devices for paediatric rehabilitation: a review of design features.
Review in Biomedical engineering online, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Parental involvement in robot-mediated intervention: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Pooled it
- Exoskeleton-assisted physiotherapy in school and outpatient contexts for minimally ambulant children with cerebral palsy.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2026Article
- Design and Preliminary Evaluation of a Smart Orthotic Videogame Controller Dedicated to Children.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- PhiCube: a reconfigurable bilateral robotic device for neurorehabilitation.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating the safety of a robotic supine gait training device for pediatric rehabilitation - a retrospective study.Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine · 2025Observational
- Patient performance assessment methods for upper extremity rehabilitation in assist-as-needed therapy strategies: a comprehensive review.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Review
- Soft Nanomembrane Sensor-Enabled Wearable Multimodal Sensing and Feedback System for Upper-Limb Sensory Impairment Assistance.ACS nano · 2025Article
- Influence of Robotic Neurorehabilitation in Cerebral Palsy on Motor Function and Gait.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Behavioral Medicine in Preventive Healthcare.Materia socio-medica · 2025Article
- ChMER: an exoskeleton robot with active body weight support walker based on compliant actuation for children with cerebral palsy.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Influence of a multidirectional overground body weight support system on walking-related tasks in typically developing children and adolescents.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Robotics in Physical Rehabilitation: Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Biosignal-integrated robotic systems with emerging trends in visual interfaces: A systematic review.Biophysics reviews · 2024Review
- Therapeutic robots for post-stroke rehabilitation.Medical review (2021) · 2024Review
- Participation of teenagers with vision or motor impairments in leisure activities: a qualitative study.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2024Article
- Perspectives on ankle-foot technology for improving gait performance of children with Cerebral Palsy in daily-life: requirements, needs and wishes.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Safety, Feasibility and Efficacy of LokomatCancers · 2023Article
- Assessment of Chinese rehabilitation assistance system for disabled children.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Physical Rehabilitation Programs for Bedridden Patients with Prolonged Immobility: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Hybrid Zero Dynamics Control for Gait Guidance of a Novel Adjustable Pediatric Lower-Limb Exoskeleton.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children with physical disabilities often have limited performance in daily activities, hindering their physical development, social development and mental health. Therefore, rehabilitation is essential to mitigate the adverse effects of the different causes of physical disabilities and improve independence and quality of life. In the last decade, robotic rehabilitation has shown the potential to augment traditional physical rehabilitation. However, to date, most robotic rehabilitation devices are designed for adult patients who differ in their needs compared to paediatric patients, limiting the devices' potential because the paediatric patients' needs are not adequately considered. With this in mind, the current work reviews the existing literature on robotic rehabilitation for children with physical disabilities, intending to summarise how the rehabilitation robots could fulfil children's needs and inspire researchers to develop new devices. A literature search was conducted utilising the Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus databases. Based on the inclusion-exclusion criteria, 206 publications were included, and 58 robotic devices used by children with a physical disability were identified. Different design factors and the treated conditions using robotic technology were compared. Through the analyses, it was identified that weight, safety, operability and motivation were crucial factors to the successful design of devices for children. The majority of the current devices were used for lower limb rehabilitation. Neurological disorders, in particular cerebral palsy, were the most common conditions for which devices were designed. By far, the most common actuator was the electric motor. Usually, the devices present more than one training strategy being the assistive strategy the most used. The admittance/impedance method is the most popular to interface the robot with the children. Currently, there is a trend on developing exoskeletons, as they can assist children with daily life activities outside of the rehabilitation setting, propitiating a wider adoption of the technology. With this shift in focus, it appears likely that new technologies to actuate the system (e.g. serial elastic actuators) and to detect the intention (e.g. physiological signals) of children as they go about their daily activities will be required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.