Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34488752›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2021

Critical comparative analysis of data sources toward understanding referral during pregnancy and childbirth: three perspectives from Nigeria.

Emma Radovich, Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas, Oona M R Campbell, Michael Ezeanochie, Uchenna Gwacham-Anisiobi, Adedapo B A Ande, Lenka Benova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Multistakeholder perspectives on geographical accessibility to emergency obstetric care in Benin City, Nigeria.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emma Radovich *Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. emma.radovich@lshtm.ac.uk.
Aduragbemi Banke-Thomas *LSE Health, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Oona M R CampbellFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Michael EzeanochieDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin, Edo State, Nigeria.
Uchenna Gwacham-AnisiobiHealth Strategy and Delivery Foundation, Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria.
Adedapo B A AndeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin, Edo State, Nigeria.
Lenka BenovaFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe highest risk of maternal and perinatal deaths occurs during and shortly after childbirth and is preventable if functional referral systems enable women to reach appropriate health services when obstetric complications occur. Rising numbers of deliveries in health facilities, including in high mortality settings like Nigeria, require formalised coordination across the health system to ensure that women and newborns get to the right level of care, at the right time. This study describes and critically assesses the extent to which referral and its components can be captured using three different data sources from Nigeria, examining issues of data quality, validity, and usefulness for improving and monitoring obstetric care systems.

methodsThe study included three data sources on referral for childbirth care in Nigeria: a nationally representative household survey, patient records from multiple facilities in a state, and patient records from the apex referral facility in a city. We conducted descriptive analyses of the extent to which referral status and components were captured across the three sources. We also iteratively developed a visual conceptual framework to guide our critical comparative analysis.

resultsWe found large differences in the proportion of women referred, and this reflected the different denominators and timings of the referral in each data source. Between 16 and 34% of referrals in the three sources originated in government hospitals, and lateral referrals (origin and destination facility of the same level) were observed in all three data sources. We found large gaps in the coverage of key components of referral as well as data gaps where this information was not routinely captured in facility-based sources.

conclusionsOur analyses illustrated different perspectives from the national- to facility-level in the capture of the extent and components of obstetric referral. By triangulating across multiple data sources, we revealed the strengths and gaps within each approach in building a more complete picture of obstetric referral. We see our visual framework as assisting further research efforts to ensure all referral pathways are captured in order to better monitor and improve referral systems for women and newborns.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesReferral and ConsultationDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansInfant, NewbornInformation Storage and RetrievalNigeriaPregnancyDataEmergency obstetric careFacility-based birthHealth systemsHousehold surveyMaternal healthMedical recordsNewborn healthNigeriaReferral

Identifiers

PMID34488752
PMCPMC8420846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.