Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34488749›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2021

A real-world economic analysis of biologic therapies for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Italy: results of the CANOVA observational longitudinal study.

Emanuela Zagni, Luca Bianchi, Gabriella Fabbrocini, Salvatore Corrao, Annamaria Offidani, Luca Stingeni, Antonio Costanzo, Giovanni Pellacani, Ketty Peris, Federico Bardazzi and 29 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors at 17 institutions in 1 country.

Emanuela ZagniNovartis Farma S.p.A, Largo Umberto Boccioni, 1, 21040, Origgio, Varese, Italy. medidata@medineos.com.
Luca BianchiPoliclinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Gabriella FabbrociniSection of Dermatology, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Salvatore CorraoARNAS Civico, Palermo, Italy.
Annamaria OffidaniDermatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic Marche University, Ancona, Italy.
Luca StingeniDermatology Section, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Antonio CostanzoIRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy.
Giovanni PellacaniDermatology Clinic, Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Ketty PerisFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS and Università Cattolica, Rome, Italy.
Federico BardazziDermatology, IRCCS Policlinico di S Orsola Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES) Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giuseppe ArgenzianoDermatology Unit, University of Campania, Naples, Italy.
Silvana RuffoloA.O. Cosenza Ospedale SS Annunziata, Cosenza, Italy.
Paolo DapavoA.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza PO Molinette, Turin, Italy.
Carlo CarreraFondazione IRCCS Ca'Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Maria Concetta FargnoliDermatology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Aurora ParodiClinica Dermatologica DiSSal Università di Genova/Ospedale-Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genoa, Italy.
Marco RomanelliU.O. Dermatologia Universitaria - Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Piergiorgio MalagoliIRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Marina TalamontiPoliclinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Matteo MegnaA.O.U. Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Massimo RaspantiARNAS Civico, Palermo, Italy.
Matteo PaolinelliDermatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic Marche University, Ancona, Italy.
Katharina HanselDermatology Section, Department of Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Alessandra NarcisiIRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy.
Andrea ContiA.O.U. Policlinico, Modena, Italy.
Clara De SimoneFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS and Università Cattolica, Rome, Italy.
Marco Adriano ChessaDermatology, IRCCS Policlinico di S Orsola Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES) Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Alina De RosaDermatology Unit, University of Campania, Naples, Italy.
Eugenio ProvenzanoA.O. Cosenza Ospedale SS Annunziata, Cosenza, Italy.
Michela OrtoncelliA.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza PO Molinette, Turin, Italy.
Chiara MoltrasioFondazione IRCCS Ca'Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Rosaria FidanzaDermatology, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Martina BurlandoClinica Dermatologica DiSSal Università di Genova/Ospedale-Policlinico San Martino IRCCS, Genoa, Italy.
Annalisa ToniniU.O. Dermatologia Universitaria - Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Francesca Maria GaianiIRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Lucia SimoniMediNeos Observational Research, Modena, Italy.
Alessandro ZulloMediNeos Observational Research, Modena, Italy.
Martina FiocchiNovartis Farma S.p.A, Largo Umberto Boccioni, 1, 21040, Origgio, Varese, Italy.
Delia ColomboNovartis Farma S.p.A, Largo Umberto Boccioni, 1, 21040, Origgio, Varese, Italy.
Novartis (Italy) · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITIRCCS Policlinico San Donato · ITMarche Polytechnic University · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITOspedale SS. Annunziata · ITPoliclinico Tor Vergata · ITUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of L'Aquila · ITUniversity of Perugia · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITPoliclinico di Modena · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease which can also involve joints. It is often associated with burdensome comorbidities which negatively impact prognosis and quality of life (QoL). Biologic agents have been shown to be effective in controlling disease progression, but their use is associated with higher costs compared with traditional systemic treatments. The economic analysis of the CANOVA (EffeCtiveness of biologic treAtmeNts for plaque psOriasis in Italy: an obserVAtional longitudinal study of real-life clinical practice) study aims to assess the costs and cost-effectiveness of biologics in a real-world context in Italy.

methodsThe annualised overall direct costs of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis management, the annualised cost of biologic drugs and the cost per responder in the Italian National Health System perspective were assessed. More specifically, the cost per response and cost per sustained response of the most prescribed biologic therapies for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis within the CANOVA study were assessed using the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) at several score levels (75, 90 and 100%).

resultsThe most frequently used biologic therapies for plaque psoriasis were secukinumab, ustekinumab, adalimumab originator, and ixekizumab. Cost of biologics was the driver of expenditure, accounting for about 98% of total costs. Adalimumab originator was the biologic with the lowest cost per responder ratio (range: €7848 - €31,378), followed by secukinumab (range: €9015 - €33,419). Ustekinumab (range: €11,689 - €39,280) and ixekizumab (range: €11,092 - €34,289) ranked respectively third and fourth, in terms of cost-effectiveness ratio. As concerns the cost per sustained response analysis, secukinumab showed the lowest value observed (€21,375) over the other options, because of its high response rate (86% vs. 60-80%), which was achieved early in time.

conclusionBiologic therapy is a valuable asset for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Concomitant assessment of treatment costs against the expected therapeutic response over time can provide physicians and payers additional insights which can complement the traditional risk-benefit profile assessment and drive treatment decisions.

Indexed as

PsoriasisQuality of LifeAntibodies, MonoclonalBiological TherapyHumansItalyLongitudinal StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalAdalimumabBiologicCost per responderCostsIxekizumabReal-worldResponse rateSecukinumabUstekinumab

Identifiers

PMID34488749
PMCPMC8422702
OpenAlexW3196509200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.