Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34488724›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2021

Usability and value of a digital learning resource in nursing education across European countries: a cross-sectional exploration.

Kristin Hjorthaug Urstad, Esther Navarro-Illana, Bjørg Oftedal, Katharine Whittingham, Santiago Alamar, Richard Windle, Atle Løkken, Michael Taylor, Marie Hamilton Larsen, Melanie Narayasanamy and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Emotional Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Nursing Students Receiving Distance Learning: An Explorative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Kristin Hjorthaug UrstadFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway. kristin.h.urstad@uis.no.
Esther Navarro-IllanaThe Faculty of Nursing, Valencia Catholic University, Catholic Carrer de Quevedo 2, Valencian Community, 46001, Valencia, Spain.
Bjørg OftedalFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway.
Katharine WhittinghamSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, NG7 2HA, Nottingham, UK.
Santiago AlamarThe Faculty of Nursing, Valencia Catholic University, Catholic Carrer de Quevedo 2, Valencian Community, 46001, Valencia, Spain.
Richard WindleSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, NG7 2HA, Nottingham, UK.
Atle LøkkenFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, 4036, Stavanger, Norway.
Michael TaylorSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, NG7 2HA, Nottingham, UK.
Marie Hamilton LarsenLovisenberg Diaconal University College, Lovisenberggata 15B, 0456, Oslo, Norway.
Melanie NarayasanamySchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, NG7 2HA, Nottingham, UK.
Javier Sancho-PelluzThe Faculty of Nursing, Valencia Catholic University, Catholic Carrer de Quevedo 2, Valencian Community, 46001, Valencia, Spain.
Pedro Navarro-IllanaThe Faculty of Nursing, Valencia Catholic University, Catholic Carrer de Quevedo 2, Valencian Community, 46001, Valencia, Spain.
Heather WharradSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, NG7 2HA, Nottingham, UK.
Valencia Catholic University Saint Vincent Martyr · ESQueen's Medical Centre · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Stavanger · NOLovisenberg Diakonale Høgskole · NOVID Specialized University · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigher education is responsible for providing education that meets international benchmarks relevant to the needs of the international community. Due to the increase of digital tools in higher education, the possibility of sharing learning resources across nations has expanded. In the current project, a Norwegian university invited universities in Spain and the United Kingdom to adapt and translate e-learning resources originally developed for Norwegian nursing students for use within their respective Bachelor in Nursing programmes.

aimThe aim of the current study was to gain insights into the usability and value for learning of e-compendiums shared and implemented across three European universities.

methodsThe study adopted a descriptive cross-sectional design and included nursing students from the University of Nottingham, Valencia Catholic University, and the University of Stavanger. Data were collected in Autumn 2017 through a questionnaire adapted from the validated "Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning Reusable Learning Object evaluation questionnaire" The questionnaire consisted of 19 items that included two aspects: e-compendiums' value for learning and e-compendiums' usability. The different study sites were compared using a binary logistic regression analysis. Subgroups of students were compared based on their gender and age.

resultsA total of 480 nursing students participated in the study. The e -compendiums were overall positively rated, especially for reinforcing and retaining knowledge. Compared to the students from the University of Stavanger, students from Valencia Catholic University rated the e-compendiums more positively in most aspects of learning. Students from University of Nottingham found the e-compendiums to be more important for learning engagement compared to students at the Norwegian study site, and no differences were found in any other aspects of learning. Younger students rated the interactivity and visual components as more important compared to older students.

conclusionsStudents from the University of Nottingham and Valencia Catholic University seem to accept the e-compendiums despite the fact that they were originally developed for use in another country. We argue that, when sharing e-learning resources across countries, an adaptation and translation process that includes a multicultural and multidisciplinary perspective should be carried out.

Indexed as

Descriptive cross-sectional research designE-learningHealth educationInternationalizationUndergraduate nursing students

Identifiers

PMID34488724
PMCPMC8419383
OpenAlexW3198603824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.