ArticleBMC medical education2021
SIESTA: a quick interprofessional learning activity fostering collaboration and communication between paediatric nursing trainees and medical students.
Article in BMC medical education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Which Factors Promote Interprofessional Competence in Placements on a Training Ward? New Findings.Medical science educator · 2026Article
- Administrative process reform in eastern coastal Chinese public hospitals: a policy and practice review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- A scoping review of interprofessional education in healthcare: evaluating competency development, educational outcomes and challenges.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Learning and working on an interprofessional training ward in neonatology improves interprofessional competencies.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Residents as learning facilitators inside and outside of interprofessional education: a faculty development program in postgraduate pediatric training.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Teaching/learning formats and cross-cutting issues for the design of interprofessional education for healthcare professions - literature review and analysis of training and examination regulations.GMS journal for medical education · 2025Review
- Enhancing the effectiveness of interprofessional education in health science education: a state-of-the-art review.BMC medical education · 2024Review
- Article
- Challenges and opportunities of evaluating work based interprofessional learning: insights from a pediatric interprofessional training ward.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Black Women Faculty and Administrators Navigating COVID-19, Social Unrest, and Academia: Challenges and Strategies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Becoming Culturally Competent: Transformative Learning in an International, Interprofessional Nursing Placement.Global qualitative nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterprofessional education has emerged as a key concept in education of health professionals over the last 20 years. Positive effects of interprofessional education have been shown, but it has proved to be more time-consuming than traditional teaching methods. We therefore developed a 30-minute interprofessional learning activity, using peer-teaching methods. We were interested in effects on and ways of interprofessional learning, including conditions and resources that make it successful despite limited time.
methodsSpeed InterprofESsional Peer Teaching PaediAtric (SIESTA) was developed in the context of an interprofessional training ward. 20 paediatric nursing trainees and 20 medical students were enrolled in the study. Two students from each profession participated in a total of four SIESTA sessions each, supervised by registered paediatric nurses and paediatricians. We used a mixed-methods approach of quantitative and qualitative data (questionnaires, semi-guided focus group interviews) to evaluate self-perceived interprofessional competencies, interprofessional learning gains and ways of interprofessional learning.
resultsQuestionnaires were obtained from all participants (n = 40) and n = 26 took part in the group interviews. Participants from both professions reported an increase in self-perceived understanding of interprofessional roles and tasks. Communication and cooperation emerged as important aspects. The workplace-based nature of SIESTA promoted interprofessional learning, while peer teaching fostered a safe learning environment. Regarding time constraints participants suggested thorough preparation and structuring by facilitators as a solution.
conclusionsOur short interprofessional peer teaching activity showed promising results. Participants reported enhanced interprofessional competencies and provided suggestions for successful learning in limited time. Further studies should include an objective assessment of the interprofessional learning progress. The SIESTA concept can be easily adapted to other medical fields, providing interprofessional learning opportunities for many more health care professionals to come.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.