Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34488220›Full record

ArticleCytogenetic and genome research2021

Cytogenetic Damage of Human Lymphocytes in Humanized Mice Exposed to Neutrons and X Rays 24 h After Exposure.

Qi Wang, Younghyun Lee, Monica Pujol-Canadell, Jay R Perrier, Lubomir Smilenov, Andrew Harken, Guy Garty, David J Brenner, Brian Ponnaiya, Helen C Turner

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytogenetic and genome research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biomarkers to Predict Lethal Radiation Injury to the Rat Lung.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. The NIAID/RNCP Biodosimetry Program: An Overview.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qi WangCenter for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Younghyun LeeCenter for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Monica Pujol-CanadellCenter for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Jay R PerrierCenter for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Lubomir SmilenovCenter for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Andrew HarkenRadiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University, Irvington, New York, USA.
Guy GartyRadiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University, Irvington, New York, USA.
David J BrennerCenter for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Brian PonnaiyaRadiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University, Irvington, New York, USA.
Helen C TurnerCenter for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USColumbia University · US

Funding

Sample Engineering CoreU19AI067773 · NIAID · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI AMUNDSON, SALLY A. · 2005 to 2024
$105.4M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI067773
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detonation of an improvised nuclear device highlights the need to understand the risk of mixed radiation exposure as prompt radiation exposure could produce significant neutron and gamma exposures. Although the neutron component may be a relatively small percentage of the total absorbed dose, the large relative biological effectiveness (RBE) can induce larger biological DNA damage and cell killing. The objective of this study was to use a hematopoietically humanized mouse model to measure chromosomal DNA damage in human lymphocytes 24 h after in vivo exposure to neutrons (0.3 Gy) and X rays (1 Gy). The human dicentric and cytokinesis-block micronucleus assays were performed to measure chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes in vivo from the blood and spleen, respectively. The mBAND assay based on fluorescent in situ hybridization labeling was used to detect neutron-induced chromosome 1 inversions in the blood lymphocytes of the neutron-irradiated mice. Cytogenetics endpoints, dicentrics and micronuclei showed that there was no significant difference in yields between the 2 irradiation types at the doses tested, indicating that neutron-induced chromosomal DNA damage in vivo was more biologically effective (RBE ∼3.3) compared to X rays. The mBAND assay, which is considered a specific biomarker of high-LET neutron exposure, confirmed the presence of clustered DNA damage in the neutron-irradiated mice but not in the X-irradiated mice, 24 h after exposure.

Indexed as

NeutronsX-RaysAdultAnimalsCells, CulturedChromosome InversionCytogeneticsDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLymphocytesMaleMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, KnockoutChromosomal aberrationsHumanized miceNeutronsX rays

Identifiers

PMID34488220
PMCPMC8455411
OpenAlexW3198695173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.