Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34488197›Full record

ArticleBiomedical physics & engineering express2021

Virtual bronchoscopy-guided lung SAbR: dosimetric implications of using AAA versus Acuros XB to calculate dose in airways.

P Kinkopf, A Modiri, Kun-Chang Yu, Y Yan, P Mohindra, R Timmerman, A Sawant, E Vicente

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical physics & engineering express, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

P KinkopfUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
A ModiriUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Kun-Chang YuBroncus Medical, Inc., San Jose, CA, United States of America.
Y YanUT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
P MohindraUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
R TimmermanUT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
A SawantUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
E VicenteUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0392-5271
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USSouthwestern Medical Center · USBroncus (United States) · US

Funding

The INSPIRE trial -Integrating Serial and Parallel Interconnected Respiratory Elements for sparing post-radiotherapy pulmonary functionR01CA202761 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Amit Sawant, Robert D Timmerman · 2016 to 2026
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA202761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In previous works, we showed that incorporating individual airways as organs-at-risk (OARs) in the treatment of lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) patients potentially mitigates post-SAbR radiation injury. However, the performance of common clinical dose calculation algorithms in airways has not been thoroughly studied. Airways are of particular concern because their small size and the density differences they create have the potential to hinder dose calculation accuracy. To address this gap in knowledge, here we investigate dosimetric accuracy in airways of two commonly used dose calculation algorithms, the anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) and Acuros-XB (AXB), recreating clinical treatment plans on a cohort of four SAbR patients. A virtual bronchoscopy software was used to delineate 856 airways on a high-resolution breath-hold CT (BHCT) image acquired for each patient. The planning target volumes (PTVs) and standard thoracic OARs were contoured on an average CT (AVG) image over the breathing cycle. Conformal and intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans were recreated on the BHCT image and on the AVG image, for a total of four plan types per patient. Dose calculations were performed using AAA and AXB, and the differences in maximum and mean dose in each structure were calculated. The median differences in maximum dose among all airways were ≤0.3Gy in magnitude for all four plan types. With airways grouped by dose-to-structure or diameter, median dose differences were still ≤0.5Gy in magnitude, with no clear dependence on airway size. These results, along with our previous airway radiosensitivity works, suggest that dose differences between AAA and AXB correspond to an airway collapse variation ≤0.7% in magnitude. This variation in airway injury risk can be considered as not clinically relevant, and the use of either AAA or AXB is therefore appropriate when including patient airways as individual OARs so as to reduce risk of radiation-induced lung toxicity.

Indexed as

BronchoscopyRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedAlgorithmsHumansLungRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedAAAacurosairwaysdose calculationfunctional avoidance radiotherapy planning

Identifiers

PMID34488197
PMCPMC8796430
OpenAlexW3198826536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.