Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34487635›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2022

Tick exposure and risk of tick-borne pathogens infection in hunters and hunting dogs: a citizen science approach.

Giovanni Sgroi, Roberta Iatta, Riccardo Paolo Lia, Ettore Napoli, Francesco Buono, Marcos Antonio Bezerra-Santos, Vincenzo Veneziano, Domenico Otranto

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Prevalence of Lyme Disease and Relapsing FeverPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The contribution ofParasitology · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Giovanni SgroiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Apulia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5809-448X
Roberta IattaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Apulia, Italy.
Riccardo Paolo LiaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Apulia, Italy.
Ettore NapoliDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Sicily, Italy.
Francesco BuonoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
Marcos Antonio Bezerra-SantosDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Apulia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0575-6758
Vincenzo VenezianoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Productions, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2496-4034
Domenico OtrantoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Apulia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7518-476X
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITBu-Ali Sina University · IRUniversity of Messina · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Citizen science may be described as a research involving communities and individuals, other than scientists. Following this approach, along with the evidence of a high prevalence of Rickettsia spp. in Dermacentor marginatus from wild boars in hunting areas of southern Italy, this study aimed to assess the occurrence of tick-borne pathogens (TBPs) in ticks collected from hunters and their hunting dogs. From October 2020 to May 2021, ticks were collected from wild boar hunters (n = 347) and their dogs (n = 422) in regions of southern Italy (i.e., Apulia, Basilicata, Calabria, Campania and Sicily). All ticks were morphologically identified, classified according to gender, feeding status, host, geographic origin, and molecularly screened for zoonotic bacteria. Adult ticks (n = 411) were collected from hunters (i.e., n = 29; 8.4%; mean of 1.6 ticks for person) and dogs (i.e., n = 200; 47.4%; mean of 1.8 ticks for animal) and identified at species level as D. marginatus (n = 240, 58.4%), Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato (n = 135, 32.8%), Rhipicephalus turanicus (n = 27, 6.6%) and Ixodes ricinus (n = 9, 2.2%). Overall, 45 ticks (i.e., 10.9%, 95% CI: 8.3-14.3) tested positive for at least one tick-borne agent, being Rickettsia slovaca the most frequent species (n = 37, 9.0%), followed by Rickettsia raoultii, Rickettsia aeschlimannii, Rickettsia monacensis, Coxiella burnetii, Borrelia lusitaniae and Candidatus Midichloria mitochondrii (n = 2, 0.5% each). Data herein presented demonstrate a relevant risk of exposure to TBPs for hunters and hunting dogs during the hunting activities. Therefore, the role of hunters to monitor the circulation of ticks in rural areas may be considered an effective example of the citizen science approach, supporting the cooperation toward private and public health stakeholders.

Indexed as

Citizen ScienceDog DiseasesIxodesTick BitesTick-Borne DiseasesAnimalsDogsHumansHuntingRickettsiaSicilyWorking Dogscitizen sciencedogshuntingItalytick-borne pathogenzoonosis

Identifiers

PMID34487635
PMCPMC9546254
OpenAlexW3197826655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.