ArticleNeurourology and urodynamics2021
A new 3D stress MRI measurement strategy to quantify surgical correction of prolapse in three support systems.
Article in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chapter 4.5: New Proposed Treatments for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- [Application of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Middle Compartment Defect].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025Review
- Vaginal morphology and position associated with prolapse recurrence after vaginal surgery: A secondary analysis of the DEMAND study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2024Article
- Variations in structural support site failure patterns by prolapse size on stress 3D MRI.International urogynecology journal · 2023Article
- Knowledge mapping and visualization analysis of pelvic organ prolapse repair with mesh from 2001 to 2021.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Pelvic inclination correction system for magnetic resonance imaging analysis of pelvic organ prolapse in upright position.International urogynecology journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe aim of this study was to develop and test the feasibility of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based measurement strategy to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical procedures in restoring normal anatomy in all three systems of pelvic floor support and quantify the structural changes induced by prolapse surgery.
methodsPatients underwent clinical examination and stress MRI preoperatively and again 3 months postoperatively. Preoperative and postoperative measures of three MRI-based structural support systems were made: (1) vaginal wall, (2) apical and paravaginal support, and (3) hiatal closure system. Preoperative to postoperative structural changes were calculated and compared to normal values, and bivariate associations were determined.
resultsThe three structural support systems were successfully quantified for both preoperative and postoperative MRIs regardless of operative approaches in all 15 women in the pilot group. Apical support was restored to normal in 11 of 12 patients who underwent an apical suspension procedure and 9 of 14 patients with a posterior repair had normalization of genital hiatus size. Mid-vaginal paravaginal location was elevated an average of 2.5 ± 2.0 cm despite no paravaginal repairs being performed. Paravaginal location improvements were also significantly correlated with apical elevation (r values 0.99-0.87, p < 0.001).
conclusionsA strategy that quantifies structural-specific preoperative impairments and improvements after prolapse surgery was successfully developed. Early findings reveal that prolapse surgery is more successful in restoring normal anatomy at Level I than Level III. Improvement in paravaginal location is significantly correlated with apical elevation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.